And further on, several times, I discuss how the supporters of the video respond and take it seriously in their comments, and the narrator of the video also participates in the conversation and does nothing to disabuse his ardent supporters of their notion that he was being serious.
Have you got something to say about this, or do you want to stick with your stock response?
I read all of them, and they indicate that the NRA went from a grassroots organizations that promoted gun safety AND gun registration to the looney toon outfit we know today at about the same time gun manufacturers began pumping millions of dollars into the group.
Corporate interests donated $71.1 to the NRA in one year alone:
I am sure that the good men of the NRA leadership were strong enough to ignore all that money, consistently advancing their leadership’s agenda. Oh, wait, the articles state that the vast majority of the NRA’s membership have polled that they favor reasonable gun registration laws, which the leadership bitterly opposes.
You must have missed those little points in the articles when you “read” them.
In any event, I never thought my cites would persuade you, only interest you to the extent that you would search them for points you thought would debunk my contention, which of course is exactly what happened.
I leave it to more disinterested readers to examine my contentions vs. yours and decide which ones reflect the truth. I’m through with you.
Either you are getting wooshed by every asinine thing PETA does, or you’re being disingenuous.
Well, yes its easy to prove that the NRA gets SOME money from the gun industry. Its a lot harder to prove that they are in the pockets of the gun industry.
Whoa. Are you referring to this sentence:
“The gun industry and other large corporate and individual donors chipped in $71.1 million in 2011 to NRA coffers, compared with $46.3 million in 2004, according to a Bloomberg News review of NRA tax returns.”
You see the part where it says individual? I know it sounds like an afterthought but considering we already have a good idea of how much the gun industry donates, we can fairly assume that the vast majority of that 71 million is from individuals.
Or are you still on the article where they say that the firearms industry gave at least 14.8 million. But the reference to the $71.1 million number there says NOTHING about corporate interests being the source of that money. In fact the example they give is a rich investment company CEO giving a million dollars so he can wear a special gold jacket around at NRA events.
Say it isn’t so. The leadership of an advocacy organization is more extreme than the average member?!?!?
This has been true of the NRA since Cinncinnati.
I wonder how disinterested readers will view how you characterized the source of the $71 million in donations the NRA gets.