It may be after this November both the position of Senate Majority Leader and Speaker of the House will be changed.
While the Democrats retain the majority in the Senate there is a good chance despite the fact Tea Partyista Sharron Angle won in Nevada, Harry Reid will be defeated for reelection. If so who will be the next Senate Majority Leader?
Also if the Republicans do regain control of the House John Boehner would presumably be the Speaker.
I don’t think any of that’s going to happen, Curtis LeMay. If it did, the obvious choices for the Republicans would be McConnell and Boehner. I wonder if DeMint would make an effort for the Senate post, though.
Pelosi isn’t going anywhere, and neither House is in danger of changing parties. Reid could lose (though his chances are better now that the Republicans nominated a complete nutbag to run against him). Schumer is rumored to be the most likely successor if that happens, followed by Durbin.
Even if they aren’t, it’s June, and as they acknowledge right their in the first sentence, she just won her primary and is getting a bounce. She’s been able to campaign against Reid during the primaries, but he didn’t know his opponent.
Well, she’s got a host of nutty positions and statements that are going to take some piss out of her campaign pretty quickly.
She wants to get rid of Social Security and Medicare, for instance, and in a state which derives a large amount of its income from the hospitality industry, saying she thinks alcohol should be illegal will not go over well, either.
And there’s also that Scientology thing, and that bizarre statement about doing laundry and cleaning bathroom is “work that Americans won’t do.”
Wait until the commercials get going. And any debates that might happen.
Reid barely has any life in him as a politician anymore, but he’s now become the only sane choice and should be able to win by default.
For what it’s worth, Nate Silver scores Mason-Dixon as having 1.57 percentage points of pollster-induced-error, and Ramussen as 1.74 . So Mason-Dixon is a bit better, but both are actually pretty good.
Nate’s ratings were based on polls taken during the last 3 weeks before an election.
Basically, the suspicion about Rasmussen is that while they poll for accuracy down the homestretch in order to maintain credibility (polls near an election can always be compared with the actual election results, after all), but that a lot of their polls earlier in the season, whose accuracy lacks such a firm benchmark, are designed to influence the narrative about the contests they’re polling.
Banning alcohol woudl be a horrible idea, but I don’t see how it would be a massive increase in government power. The government is allowed to ban things and it’s banned plenty of other things. A Constitutional amendment would be required and blah blah blah.
No. But it sounds like she has supported Scientology backed “health” programs.
Specifically, Angle was in a video promoting the Second Chance program, and tried unsuccessfully to get it implemented in the Nevada prison system when she was in the state assembly.
The Second Chance program is a drug detox program that uses L. Ron Hubbard’s “Purification Rundown”. It basically involves paying a lot of money, taking enough niacin so that you suffer from mild niacin overdose, and then sitting in a sauna to sweat out your “toxins”.