Seen the fact that the current US president and government managed to convince about the entire world
that the US can never be trusted for one single second
that the US is governed by spoiled children who make “freedom fries” a slogan when an ally doesn’t want to kiss their feet (not to mention all the rest of the childish insults towards allies and the incredible indecent behaviour in order to get countries support their murder plans)
that the USA thinks it has the right to act against and in violation with international law, although these treaties were signed by US governments (see point one, to which this is an addition)
of its competence to mass murder people of a sovereign nation, while proudly boasting about “You ain’t seen nothign yet” and “Shock and Awe” (and I don’t even speak here about Aghanistan and other US adventures)
that destruction and bloodshed is all the USA knows about, because when it comes to reconstruct and repari what they invaded and destroyedn the USA stands nowhere
that lying and cheating and empty rethoric is all the USA is in fact extremely good at, except for the murder and bloodshed
that the USA isn’t worth one single grain of a sign of respect let be credibility attributed to its government, and to the nation in general
I have 2 questions:
Do you have any idea how a next president and government of the USA will be able to resolve this?
Do you have any idea how this will end if the US’ers are crazy enough to re-elect this same president and crew?
Non US comments are also welcomed of course. It is always interesting to see and hear different voices.
Salaam. A
Hopefully, unlike yourself, most people will be able to distinguish the difference between a particular administration, and the populace which was stupid enough to elect him. Once.
How are your sweeping generalizations any different from those nitwits who condemn all Muslims as terrorists?
However the OP is cloaked, at core his fundamental question isn’t a bad one. Stripped of the rhetoric it boils down to how will a future government deal with the global resentment/hatred of the US that George Bush has created? It’s a nasty legacy he will leave to his successor.
Seen the fact that the current US president and government managed to convince about the entire world…
END QUOTE.
“entire world” meaning to give impression of how large amounts of the non US’ers, interested in what happens in the world, perceives the USA and its current president, government, policy In my opinion every normal reasoning person should be able to distinct this intention from this particular sentence.
Maybe people should actually try to read what is posted instead of making suggestions about things that aren’t posted at all?
Do you have any idea how a next president and government of the USA will be able to resolve this?
Do you have any idea how this will end if the US’ers are crazy enough to re-elect this same president and crew?
I think you answered the second one.
But what is you opinion on the first one?
If you are not a native speaker of a language, many of its nuances and subtleties will escape you. When I wrote “However the OP is cloaked…” it means “However the OP is written…” That and nothing more. Cloaked in this instance doesn’t mean “disguised” if that’s what you are thinking.
Well, there is a small upside to this: the election. If God shall cease to avert his eyes, and we can overcome to huge money advantage the Pubbies have, we can chuck the bugger out. And then change the policies the world finds so odious.
Behold, we then say, we changed our minds, then changed our government. Its called “elections” and its really, really cool. Try it, you’ll love it.
Our reconstruction efforts worked pretty damned well for Germany and Japan. But it took us time. Years, not weeks. You can’t go from tyrannical government to democracy overnight.
Blaron-- yeah, but we had a reason to be in Japan and Germany in the first place. And the rest of the world supported us being there. And most americans supported it. And the Japanese Emperor voluntarily stepped aside.
Please don’t compare this to WWII. It is really so different.
Well I can’t help it, but I wonder why Americans tend to tear WWII into a discussion about the criminal invasion of the USA of a sovereign nation.
Because when we start comparing with WWII… What exactly was Hitler doing to sovereign nations?
You are on very thin ice if you start twisting things like that.
As far as I am concerned, the Afghanistan ‘adventure’ was very different from the Iraq invasion. Most sensible people in the ‘rest of the world’ seemed to support what we did in Afghanistan, in spite of their deep reservations about Bush. That is how we have everyone from Germans to Turks providing key support there. If anything, the attitude was that it took America to long (until its own population suffered) to acknowledge that the Taliban was a problem. I am only embarassed that our government seems not to be doing much to prevent Afghanistan from slipping back into chaos.
