Last Wednesday morning, Mike and Mike (of the ESPN 1050 New York morning radio show) were discussing the problems with the NFL’s overtime rule.
For those unfamiliar with the rule: the team that scores first in the overtime session wins the game. A coin flip before the overtime period determines who gets the ball first. The major issue that people have with the rule is that if a team gets the ball and scores on its first possession, the game is over with the other team not having had a chance at a possession. The NFL has had this rule in place for as far back as I can remember and, my guess is that they would prefer not to change it.
On Thursday, I e-mailed my simple fix to Mike and Mike, although I have no idea if anyone read my e-mail. Warner Wolf does a Saturday morning show on the same station, and it just so happens that people were calling in with their suggestions. Most of these involved wholesale changes to the rule with various convoluted options and scenarios. When I told Warner my solution, he promptly dismissed it. I’ll tell you his 2 reasons after I reveal it to you.
Here’s my fix: At the beginning of every NFL game, there is a coin flip to determine who gets the ball at the beginning of the game and at the beginning of the 3rd quarter. I propose that at the same time, a second coin flip is done to determine who gets the ball in a potential overtime. This takes 5 extra seconds at the beginning of each game, but imho, makes the current rule much fairer.
Here’s my reasoning:
Currently during regulation, neither team knows who would get the ball first in a potential overtime. The ultimate winner of the overtime coin flip is perceived to have an advantage. This is confirmed by the fact that no coach in his right mind would ever elect to kickoff to the other team in overtime.
Having the overtime coin flip before the game takes away much of this advantage. A team that knows that it will have to kickoff in overtime can manage its 4th quarter strategy better. For example, instead of kicking a game-tying extra point, it can go for a 2-point conversion. Or instead of settling for a game-tying field goal, it might try a bit harder for the go-ahead touchdown.
Here were Warner’s points:
- You still have the problem of the potential of only one team getting the ball in OT.
My answer: But now at least the other team is aware of this and can do something to prevent an overtime (if it chooses to; obviously if it is confident in its defense, it doesn’t have to).
- No one wants to think about overtime before the game even starts.
My answer: And no one will. Since the probability of an overtime is so small, no one will care. If anything, this de-emphasizes the importance of the overtime coin flip. It only becomes relevant if there is the potential for a tie at the end of regulation.
Warner, who never cut me off the previous 2 times I called, cut me off before I could respond to his objections.
But my final point would’ve been: Before the game starts, we already know who will be getting the ball first in the 1st and 3rd quarters. Why not the 5th “quarter”?
Any thoughts?