The first two acts of Spike Lee’s HBO documentary, When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts aired last night, and I was pretty impressed.
So far, it’s been mostly a straight forward time-line style documentary. But, he did a great job of organizing it, and has found some very interesting characters to interview for the piece (particularly the “sassy” black lady – the one getting “prayed up” before the storm hit.)
He also had some footage that I’ve never seen. In particular, there was one shot of a man who walked through rain and wind right up to a stationary news camera and said to the cameraman, the levee just broke, and such-and-such street is starting to fill with water.
The dead body montage at the end was amazing.
He definitely is slamming the Federal handling of it, but no worse than the MSM was doing at the time so it doesn’t feel like he’s overly grinding his axe.
He almost lost me at about the 20 minute mark when he started giving creedence to the voices saying that they thought the levees were blown up. But, then he framed that in its historical context (and included footage from 1927 in which a levee really HAD been blown up). But, it seemed to me that he wasn’t really playing up that conspiracy theory, but just showing that level of distrust that exists that allows people to even “go there”.
So far, I wouldn’t call it a “spike lee joint”. It’s really just a very good, concise, organized documentary about Hurricane Katrina. It ties together so many different facets, you really can’t see Soledad Obrien grilling Brownie too many times, can you?
Guaranteed to win some Emmys come next year.
Any other opinions?
(unfortunately, I’m not going to be able to watch Acts 3 & 4 tonight but I’ll catch them in replay).
Why does anyone NOT have HBO? (ok, I know the answer to that, already, but dang)