We should be careful of what we are hunting. (Warning: YouTube link.)
Sum of the story is: women is cited and removed from public land because her sign did not conform to what the authorities wanted it to conform with. The argument that it wasn’t public land, well, the Supreme Court already dealt with this back in 1946.
I don’t know. Honestly, I’m appalled. How could any person in a position of authority actually believe that was the correct - or even legal - action to take? Ok, I know how, but seriously. Why is anything like this accepted? She didn’t even have a provocative sign!!
If anybody has any information on a legal defense fund for this women, please post a link. Although I am a poor student I’ll go without beer for a few weeks to help support her.