Nonstandard airliner landing approaches

On a United flight from Denver to Houston two weeks ago, we made a non-standard approach into Bush Intercontinental. As a commercial airliner junky, I was wondering if the pilots out there could tell me what it was called and how common it is. I am not a pilot, but I do play Flight Simulator a lot. In this flight, I had the added advantage of listening to ATC over the in-cabin music system. I didn’t really notice anything unusual, so I assume it wasn’t anything really out of the ordinary for ATC or the pilot. We landed safely and smoothly without incident. My wife asked me “Is that normal?” (I have explained slats, flaps, spoilers, thrust reversers, etc. to her on previous flights) and I had to answer “I have no idea.”

26 and 27 are usually the approach runways. 26 is north of the airport, 27 is south of the airport. Usually, what happens is you get put into the pattern somewhere northeast of the airport and intercept a localizer and fly IFR in. We were in a 737 and approved for approach into 26. What we did was flew something like a 220 compass heading directly into the airport and made a 40 degree turn about 100 feet off the ground, right over the runway threshold. The only thing like that I had ever seen was the “interesting” approach into the old Hong Kong Kai Tak airport. In that one, you made about a 90 degree bank around 50 feet over a heavily industrialized neighborhood and then immediately landed on a peninsula facing away from the city. When I flew on that, I was sitting in the middle seat bank of a 747, and I remember Marlboro billboards whizzing by the windows while we were still in the air. This one was of course far less extreme, but it was still unnerving to see 20 degrees of bank with under 100 feet of altitude.

I seem to remember the pilot being approved to fly “right in.” I wasn’t really concentrating on the chatter, but I don’t remember a VFR approval. There was around a 3000 foot scattered cloud ceiling, with very little wind. It was right before 7 PM (so right at sunset) and visibility was good under 3000 feet. While leaving the airport, I saw planes stacked up on the 26 and 27 approaches in the standard positions in a direct line to the east of the airport, so it wasn’t something that everybody was doing that day.

Anybody have any ideas what I am talking about?

Similar thing happened to me flying Sydney to Alice Springs - The aircraft flew parallel to the runway at Alice but several hundred feet away and then did a brilliant 180 turn to touch down on the threshold. I really enjoyed it and I’d say the pilots relish the chance to do it as well - gotta be more exciting than intercepting an ILS 10 miles out and just floating slowly down.

I’ll second what you said about Kai Tek as well - an amazing experience to look in to people’s apartments as you came into land!

Well, it sounds as if he’s been cleared for a visual approach with a close base leg, most likely to fit into the sequence. We do it occassionally, not too unusual.

I’m just going to throw in here with the observation that air traffic has a lot of leeway how they’re going to bring the airplanes in. With good visibility it’s just not as necessary to maintain the published instrument approaches. Might have been a matter of being able to shave a few minutes off the approach time and fit your plane into traffic more easily with what they did.