Thanks, guys. I was feeling half-flamed there.
Well, that’s because you’re only a half-wit.
It’s Canadians like you that keep the rest of us humble. But for your assholery dragging down the average, we would be by far the best country on Earth, instead of just bouncing around the top three.
Sorry, frenchie, last I heard we dropped to about #7. Just under Luxemburg. I love your obsequiousness. Not very Canadian, but very funny.
“Frenchie” ?
Wow, your ignorance just knows no depths at all, does it?
Nope. Sorry. You flame me, I flame you. Who on earth do you think you are talking to?
Calling someone “frenchie” is a flame? Check the date on your wit carton, I think it’s most likely expired.
My first guess was Ernest P. Worrell, but that guy’s dead.
He probably just took a look at Bryan Ekers location, saw that it said Montreal and Qc, put two and two together asked his parents what the answer should be and was answered : “Three”, because, of course, if you’re from Québec, you’re an evil separatist francophone that forces poor true anglophone Canadians to read French when they’re having their breakfast cereals. Truly he’s a :wally .
Yeah, I picked up on the Montreal being in Quebec French-Canadian thing, but “frenchie” seems so… I dunno… weak for a flame. Somewhere along the line of calling me “mick” if you knew I was part Irish. If that verbal flame was a real fire flame, it wouldn’t singe his nose hair if he was trying to snort it.
Haha. No, frenchie is not a flame in Canadian terms, at this point it’s more or less a term of endearment. Not that dude’s impression though. I wouldn’t want to flame anyone, actually. But I’m always wary of people who seem to get all of their info off the TV, which is really all about ratings and not accuracy. People can patiently insult me all they like, but I lived for years in Montreal, and consider it the most beautiful city I’ve seen, except maybe Victoria. Who is this Worrell guy? And I’m 46 and my parents are long since dead. You putzes are funny.
Well, it’s a combination of damaged chromosomes, frequent childhood beatings and breastfeeding until the age of seventeen or so. I hope Not in Anger can operate a telephone, because then he might be able to contact some legal aid societies in his area and seek damages from his parents, who are truly to blame in this matter.
I was just surprised at the “frenchie” thing, because (a) it’s not correct, and (b) even if it WAS correct, why would I be insulted by it? I believe Not in Anger is doing his best to use all the tools nature gave him, such as they are. Sooner or later, he might decide on a slighty different tactic: one that says he is superior because we are putting more effort into responding then he is in inciting. I wouldn’t take it too seriously, though. Entomologists (that’s “bug scientists” to you, Not In Anger) devote a lot of time to studying, but that doesn’t mean the cockroaches have any reason to be smug as they skitter across the kitchen floor, hiding from the light.
>> I’m 46
Have you considered growing up? Isn’t it about time you grew up a bit? Could you at least pretend like you are 16 or something?
Well, while I was composing, I see Not In Anger sneaked in a post about his parents being dead. I suppose his only hope now is for compassionate governmental assistance.
He’s right about Montreal being beautiful, though. Imagine that.
Oh, give it up.
Okay, if it’s a mutual decision. Surely you can see that many of your earlier posts were designed only to irritate people (telling the Americans to “disband”, for example), and if you can’t see it, then you’ll have a short miserable life on this board because there will always be people jumping at the chance to metaphorically pound you into formless goo, and many of them can do so without actually sinking to your level in the process.
Wow, so many mixed metaphors…
Anyhoo, I would suggest you cool it on the generalizations. The only thing they prove is that you can’t or won’t form a thoughtful opinion.
Let’s try deconstructing this to see if we can make sense of it…
Ah, then that explains the “You flame me, I flame you” comment… hang on, no it doesn’t. So let’s move on.
Maybe the “I flame you, you flame me” comment reinforced that impression somewhat.
Huh? So somewhere along the way, he’s come to the conclusion one or more people here seem to get their info from the TV, which isn’t accurate. This in some way justifies the flaming which he doesn’t want to give, but being TV watchers, we’ve really brought it on ourselves I guess.
I have no idea how the first part of this sentence is connected to the second part. Living for years in Montreal is a magical fairyland and makes one innune to insults. Either that or he’s trying to explain that “frenchie” is not a flame since he’s lived in Montreal. Neither one is very logical, so let’s just toss a coin… It’s heads, which means we’re going with the magical fairyland choice.
You’ve got the internet, look it up.
And a non-sequitor to end things on. I like peanut butter and mint chocolate chip ice cream, though not necessarily together.
You’re losing your touch, Not In Anger, you were dangerously close to being coherent a couple times there.
Pardon me for being bored.
Do you kids actually get little gold stars for your debate points?
Not In Anger haven’t you gone to bed yet?
I can’t speak for any kids on the board, but I personally find creep-crushing is it’s own reward.
Creep.
If you really are bored, though, I’m sure you can find some big-print books in your neighborhood about dogs named “Scamp” or something. And many times the pages are waterproof, too, so you can drool all you want.
Vicious wee rottweilers, aren’t we. Get an actual gf, or masturbate, or whatev. I 'm done on this thread.
I hope that’s true.
Actually. I don’t give a shit.