What are everyone’s thoughts on the Casey Martin vs the PGA dispute?
For anyone that doesn’t know, Casey Martin is a professional golfer with a circulatory problem in his leg. This makes it hard (maybe impossible) for him to walk 18 holes of golf. “So why not ride a cart?” you might ask. Well, normally, that wouldn’t be a problem, but on the PGA tour, carts are illegal. Every golfer walks. Let me repeat that, because it bears repeating. EVERY GOLFER ON THE PGA TOUR HAS TO WALK, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES.
Now.
This fellow Martin wants to play in the PGA, and he thinks he ought to be able to use a cart because of his circulatory problem. Thing is, the PGA said No Way, Jose. Well, Martin sued, using the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) against the PGA. I just read in the paper today that the court ruled for Martin.
Personally, I don’t think he should be allowed to ride. If a guy missing his left arm tried to become a professional boxer, could he ask the IBF, the IBC or the WBA (I think I got those right…) to outlaw right-handed punches from the other fighter during his matches? It’s the same premise…a handicapped (sorry, differently-abled) person is changing the rules of the game because he can’t cope. If you have one arm, you simply don’t box. If you can’t walk 18 holes, you don’t play in the PGA. Seems simple to me.
Plus, riding in a cart gives Martin an unfair advantage over the walking golfers. Anyhoo, this should spark some interesting debate. Feel free to tear me up if any of you are “differently-abled” posters.