[QUOTE=Sam Stone]
True, in the most part. But then, she [Hillary] spent a lot of time when she was younger helping build that notion.
[/QUOTE]
Yeh, I know what you mean. Only a really dangerous radical would have campaigned for Goldwater in '64.
[QUOTE=Sam Stone]
True, in the most part. But then, she [Hillary] spent a lot of time when she was younger helping build that notion.
[/QUOTE]
Yeh, I know what you mean. Only a really dangerous radical would have campaigned for Goldwater in '64.
I was thinking of the first few years in the White House with Bill. That’s when everyone really got to know her. During that time, she was supposed to be ‘co-president’, and she started the Hillarycare project, wrote “It Takes a Village”, was apparently a force in helping Bill decide to hire people like Donna Shalala, and complained of a vast right-wing conspiracy. She really did come across as very liberal.
Pretty much everything Sam Stone said lines up with my belief system, with two exceptions:
It’s a fairly recent phenomenon that the conservative/liberal split has conformed to party lines. There used to be large groups of conservative Democrats and liberal Republicans. So while segregation might not be a part of Republican history, it is a part of conservative history.
Sam Stone’s post said pretty much what I would say for each of these points, and better than I would have. Terrific post, Sam.
[QUOTE=Sam Stone]
Oh, man. The right isn’t even in the same league as the angry left when it comes to intolerant language aimed at their opponents.
[/QUOTE]
:dubious: Oh, come on! Go to Democratic Underground, go to Free Republic, and see which drips more venom!