Maybe Musk should have his engineers print out their code for his personal review again?
$6.5 billion is lower than any valuation Twitter has had since it went public in 2013, and about a tenth of the all-time high market cap in 2021.
Edit: Well, this is just Fidelity assigning a value to its stake in Twitter, not the entire value of Twitter, so if you add in Elon’s valuation of infinity dollars then it balances out.
The headline on that article is incorrect, per a post upthread, the overall valuation is $15 billion…$6.55 million is Fidelity’s stake.
The question is did 
quit or was fired.
My bad. I’ve been working on my agile reading comprehension.
Elmo’s pinned tweet is now a link to a stream of Matt “12-year-olds aren’t having enough children” Walsh’s anti-trans fauxcumentary.
So, the answer to that question is “A woman is a baby factory”?
Which is really funny since Matt’s ‘’‘’‘movie’‘’‘’ violates Twitter’s community standards for misgendering.
“They” is Twitter.
Matt? THE CALL IS COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE!
I believe the correct answer is “someone too old for Matt Walsh to be attracted to”.
Which is why the head of trust and safety resigned - Elmo overruled his own TOS to platform hate speech because he’s mad that his girlfriend left him for a transwoman and his trans child wants nothing to do with him.
I haven’t seen this, “movie” and I probably don’t want to. Would someone give me a quick synopsis of it? I bow to anyone who took one for the team by watching it.
No need to, I did check Rationalwiki and their entry on Walsh pointed to another favorite anti quack group that did take the bullet already in a long expose of that fakementary, the guys at Science Based Medicine are merciless against that video trash:
In conclusion:
A propaganda film with nothing new to say
As observed by Dr. David Gorski in his review of VAXXED, all documentaries have a definite point of view; none are truly “neutral” (although some are obviously much less neutral than others). However, having a point of view and a narrative that a filmmaker is trying to convey to the audience does not imply permission to present information and data deceptively or dishonestly. Walsh’s “documentary” not only presents misinformation as fact, but, just as VAXXED cycles through a “greatest hits” list of anti-vaccine false claims and tropes, What is a Woman? plays back a similar “greatest hits” list of the most pernicious anti-trans tropes and false claims, such as:
- There is a “gender ideology” that denies “biological sex.”
- ROGD is real.
- Trans women are not only “not real women” but present an existential threat to children and “real” women.
- Gender-affirming medicine is not just experimental but very dangerous. (This last trope echoes a favorite antivax trope claiming that vaccines—especially COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines—are “experimental” and “dangerous“.)
The film has already received accolades from numerous media outlets, making it a dangerous and influential piece of propaganda that further fuels the anti-trans movement. It should not be surprising that it utilizes techniques common to all propaganda films designed to deny consensuses based on science and medicine or other areas of academic expertise, such as history.
In the end, Walsh is no more an expert on gender than Jenny McCarthy is on vaccines or Ben Stein is on evolution; all are lay people invoking bad science to support their ideologies. With his film, Walsh clearly did not set out to honestly seek answers to a perplexing question, even if they are complex. Instead, he started with a conclusion and then sought out sources to support that conclusion, no matter how dubious the source, making this film an exercise not in honest truth-seeking but rather motivated reasoning. In making this film, Walsh not-coincidentally fueled the flames of conservative pundits and internet trolls to further mock and degrade trans people using fake experts, bad science, false equivalences, conspiracy theories, and blatantly false claims to reach his predetermined conclusion. We fear that What is a Woman? will still be used by anti-trans activists five and ten years from now, just as VAXXED and Expelled! are still used today by, respectively, antivaccine activists to demonize vaccines and creationists to attack Darwin. That’s because What is a Woman? is an example of the same tool that antivaxxers, creationists, and other science-denying conspiracy theorists use to promote their messages.
I absolutely love the introductory quote on that page;
“If sex and gender are the same thing, Matt Walsh fans have never had gender.”
Twitter is now the 4th most hated brand in America after The Trump Organization, FTX and Fox:
In the interest of fairness, two points;
-
This isn’t a survey of most hated brands - it’s a survey of the reputation of the 100 most recognized brands in America, and Twitter rated #97 - so they’re the fourth worst in the group surveyed, but there could theoretically be more hated brands that didn’t make the list of 100 most recognized.
-
They actually did better than last year, when they were #98.
That being said - agile winning-hearts-and-minds!
Ah, so that trash film is basically anti-trans propaganda. I thought it might be similar to Elmo’s “we must populate the Earth with white people” philosophy.
Matt Walsh markets dolls of himself in a diaper to children. That’s all you need to know about him.
The Sweet Baby Plushie is the perfect statement piece for your home, for your kids to play with,
Matt? I thought being a groomer was a bad thing.
Is that real? Thats weird! Little stuffed animals, sure, but…whoa.
$24.99 real.