Now That Prince George Was Born, Is The Impetus for Succession Reform Gone?

They “have to” because that’s what was agreed, but it’s not a universal legal requirement. The UK and New Zealand have parliamentary supremacy, so even if there was a law requiring that it be made in all Commonwealth realms, a newer law would just supersede that.

No, it just says in the preamble that it’s a good idea for all the Commonwealth Realms to agree. It doesn’t void anything, or require legislation in every country (AFAIK only three countries legislated the abdication of Edward VIII, and one of them (Canada) did it several months after it had agreed to the abdication and proclaimed George VI as king).

At least five of the realms are just not going to have any legislation this time aorund, on the grounds that their constitutions don’t require it. Canada’s legislation isn’t exactly similar, as it only “consents” to the British legislation (in an attempt to avoid having to deal with the Constitution).

Actually, all four of the countries that had adopted the Statute of Westminster at the time (I didn’t realize Australia and New Zealand waited until the 40s) did pass abdication legislation, although only the UK and Ireland did it in a timely manner, and Canada and South Africa still recognized George VI as king in December 1936 even though their legislation wasn’t enacted until well into 1937.

Thanks for the detailed explanation - very interesting.

There hasn’t been any conservative opposition to this change. Even the crustiest of old fogies recognise that male primogeniture is way past its sell by date, and saying otherwise would be a pretty gross insult to our extremely well respected incumbent.

In fact, many have demanded that the principle be extended to other areas, such as hereditary peerages.