Talking over beers, a few people have mentioned intentionally including “trigger words” in their texts, emails, and phone conversations. Thoughts? If enough people include a “jihad” or two in every conversation will it make snooping worthless?
(Mods: not sure if this is the appropriate forum)
I doubt it. The kind of data analysis they so is almost certainly looking at connections and patterns, not just filtering scary words. It’s big data, not email by email snooping.
I suppose one way to fight back against government eavesdropping . . . - Great Debates - Straight Dope Message Board between you and BrainGlutton they will have all hands on deck 
Heh. Thanks. Didn’t see it. I heard people discussing it and thought it was “new”.
Reported.