I will have to digest (with no calories ) everything said when I have more time. But after a quick glance, here’s my comments:
On the ketone question, there seems to be some merit to what both sides said:
“ketogenic diets tend to accelerate fat loss because when fat is coverted to ketones, it cannot be converted back to fat, and so is excreted”
For the full paragraph, I got this from “http://www.solid.net/~homerc/#Q1” a faq on lcd’s.
Something else I’d like to understand:
What happens when you go on a lcd? Do the proteins not used for muscle growth get converted to fat? Or do they get excreted out? What creates the ketones first, dietary fat or stored fat or some of both? If dietary fat does not get used and converted to ketones, does it just stay in your blood, or does it get excreted ever? If it stays in your blood and cannot get excreted, that means that a high fat high protein diet will be much less effective than a high protein moderate/low fat diet…
barbitu8, do you really feel that no food (/potential calories or however you want to word it) is ever excreted? I’ve seen wholly undigested food in my (I know it’s gross, but it’s for Science! ) feces…Nothing big of course but some contents from pizza toppings for example…
RE: exercise, I’d love to exercise my whole life. I do get on exercise kicks where I rollerblade / run 5-6 times a week. I look great when I do. But eventually, I get in front of the computer and go into geek programming mode and that can last a LONG time…and I enjoy reading, researching, learning a lot more than exercising. And I like food. I can fool myself into thinking that I can work out 5 days a week for the rest of my life, but I know that I won’t even though I care deeply about my health…
Finally:
I haven’t seen any mainstreamer argue with the assertions the lcd advocates make about insulin promoting fat storage and glucagon promoting fat burning. So I feel pretty comfortable to say that in my view the mainstreamers really dropped the ball.
Where? In the fact that people get regular blood tests and no one I’ve spoken to, including my parents, one of whom is a diabetic and the other has a pacemaker btw, ever got a blood test with a count of their insulin or glucagon in the blood. Glucose yes. But not insulin.
Since insulin causes fat storage, this is a major oversight. The Eades in their clinic, apparently make this a matter of course. So your regular doctor will not even know that you may have insulinemia.
And therefore, mainstreamers have difficulty answering questions about low carb diets. They don’t even know anything about insulin counts.
That’s also why I don’t trust their criticisms on lcd’s. I just don’t get the feeling they have the data to PROVE or DISPROVE the diet. That is a real shame. Atkins has been around for 40 years, hasn’t it. Mainstreamers say no studies have backed up Atkins. But none seem to disprove it either. 40 Years is plenty of time to have done plenty of studies. Why haven’t they? I wish they would have because I don’t trust Atkins or Eades either. They publish books/products to make money. So even if they know of negatives about the diet, I believe they may not mention it in their book if there is a negative.
I’m still studying this Atkins business and am not 100% convinced. But I’d rather take the risk on the kidneys than be sure of the problems with heart disease with the mainstream diets that don’t work in the long run…