Baal_Houtham:
Hi Brick . Generally I can see your viewpoint, but this is nuts. It’s so off the wall that it doesn’t lend itself well to intellectual refutation. One of my posting rules is not to get suckered into “Blue Sky” arguments. That means that if I say the sky is blue, then I don’t care that it’s possible for someone else to deny it convincingly --and with rigorous logic-- and argue the position for hours on end.
The Second Amendment is about carrying guns. A Second Amendment solution is one achieved by use of guns. The problem that might (regrettably) require the use of guns is the political policies of Harry Reid and his cohorts.
To say that a Second Amendment solution might be necessary is to say that normal, non-violent political measures might be inadequate.
To assert another meaning for “Second Amendment solution” is a BS argument.
Well, the point is moot. In the thread specifically devoted to this topic, someone drew my attention to a specific quote of hers that I hadn’t noticed or absorbed before, and prompted this post:
Yes, I must admit I didn’t carefully read each quote that was offered there. I know I must have seen those posts, but obvious I didn’t pay as much attention as I should have.
OK, point conceded. Angle’s quote that you’ve provided was not metaphorical, and that of course strongly suggests that her OTHER quotes were not either.