I think everyone is at a total loss as to why you resurrected this thread with that earlier post.
I’m assuming the Watergate reference was sarcastic - as in Obama’s opponents wish this was the equivalent of Watergate for him when it obviously isn’t and won’t be. Doesn’t have much to do with the original topic, but since Kozmik started this thread maybe he sees some other link. Or not. 
Also I predicteda Lewinsky-type scandal, though not necessarily involving Barack Obama.
Obama will not have a Lewinsky scandal. That doesn’t mean anyone else in the Obama administration won’t.
Wow, that’s a pretty big out you left yourself for that prediction. It effectively translates to: Someone in government will have an affair, and it will cause a problem for them professionally.
If you phrased it that way, you wouldn’t have had much of an argument, though.
Obama is in trouble, considering he hand picked Petraeus from the lower ranks and made him CIA director over the screams of the Republicans.
Or not. Remember the Petraeus Betray us thing?
Anyhow, this is just the break the Romney campaign needs!
As I recall the “Petraeus Betray Us” thing was MoveOn douchebaggery which the Republicans were at great pains to denounce, citing the general’s important service to our country blah blah blah.
He was servicing our country. One reporter at a time.