No, YOU have nothing! 
I simply described how that likely came to be.
Who said I’m assuming anything? All I did was offer a likely explanation as to why you couldn’t find an IRS admission online stating that they’d made a mistake on her taxes.
What is your evidence for “likely”?
You said you were assuming she was telling the truth.
Why would you assume that, when she already lied about it in the past?
Well, in the 1980s anyway, by proxy.
I don’t know that the IRS can or is even legally allowed to comment on a previous legal matter like that, whether to refute or support O’Donnell’s statements. Have they done it before?
She specifically said we fought the Soviets during those times, is the point. She doesn’t have a good grasp of recent history.
:rolleyes:
No, I didn’t. I suggested that if one were to assume that she’s telling the truth, the likely explanation to your not being able to find evidence of it on the internet was that the IRS had not posted it to the internet.
On her website is a section titled Christine Counters, in which she claims to refute the charges against her.
Regarding the IRS lien is a link to this transcript of a telephone call with an IRS agent. In the call the agent says the letter was sent to her automatically by a computer, but does not say that it was in error.
Doesn’t anybody around here research these things anymore?
Was I supposed to research it?
Well, instead of talking about assumptions and probablies, some people might be interested in what actually happened.
This election isn’t just a hypothetical exercise.
Does anyone here think that Chrisintine O’Donnell is really beutiful and would like to have sex with her? I would. I think she’s gorgeous. I’ve said it before.
She’s unmarried. I wonder if any lucky man gets to tap that ass? I am sure her office fields hundreds of weirdoes like me who wants to marry her or worse.
No. I can certainly see how someone else could have that opinion, but she just doesn’t do it for me. Eye of the beholder, and all that.
I don’t know how I’d cope with the cognitive dissonance of a politician who I thought was manifestly unqualified but also drop-dead gorgeous.
She’s a cutie.
It’s the Sarah Palin syndrome, compared against other female politicians she’s drop dead gorgeous. Compared to regular women she’s merely average.
Since she doesn’t believe in either premarital sex or masturbation, there’s a good chance she has never known pleasure. On the plus side, she’d be in no position to critique your technique or the result.
Again: why would you (or anyone) assume that she is telling the truth now, when it’s a known fact that she’s lied about this in the past?
she dabbled in sexuality before she decided against it.
Damn. . .There are a lot of malapropisms out there, but I’d never heard that one until now. It doesn’t even make any sense when said that way, and totally disregards it’s origins.
Umm…hello? IRS=Government. Government=Never Right.
Therefore, it’s a completely tautology. You going to argue with 1 < 2 next?
-Joe
It is a little weird that she hasn’t been married. Usually women with her ideology marry relatively early. I was in a Baptist Bible Study in college; one of the weird characteristics of the group was that couples in the group would marry before most of their friends knew they were dating. Then again, I recently met a conservative christian who was still “saving herself” at age 30, so I guess Ms. O’Donnell is not alone.
I’d do her. But then again I’d also do Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann. Any women that nutty have to be wild in the sack.