This here is kinda sad: http://gawker.com/5674353/i-had-a-one+night-stand-with-christine-odonnell?skyline=true&s=i
Set a pick and then try to work the ball to the center in the low post.
Man, those pictures are creepy. A friend of my wife (preacher’s wife, naturally) looks soooooo much like her. And she thinks Palin is the best thing to happen to this country since Jesus founded it in 1776, too. Maybe the bone structure leads to certain wavelengths getting picked up?
Creepy.
-Joe
According to O’Donnell’s comments on the Today show this morning, it was because she hadn’t done any makeup (prepped for radio as opposed to video).
As much as I detest O’Donnell, I think this guy is just talking out of his ass. I’m not saying that this couldn’t have happened, but what proof do we have other than him saying that it happened. As far the pictures, those could have just been taken while she was out to dinner with friends on Halloween night.
No doubt, although how does he have them? If he pulled them from flickr I’m sure someone would have pointed to it by now.
Then again, does it really matter? The only reason to keep hammering on her is to maybe show this dimwit that politics is a rough game and that not everyone can manage to Palin their way past the media.
Then again, a guy who would lose interest in a (quick math) 29-30 year-old naked Christine O’Donnell because she doesn’t wax isn’t all that believable either.
-Joe
The guy she dated at around that time had two roommates. It is entirely believable one of the roommates got his hands on pictures from that Halloween. It’s believed he’s been identified. Whether or not anything else he mentioned happened is anyone’s guess.
The story reads like some jerk with a grudge who wants to slut shame a woman. He’s oh-so-passive throughout as she aggressively pursues him and then he rejects her because she doesn’t wax. Whatever, buddy.
The response from O’Donnell’s campaign is no better. In part:
I don’t see any indication that Coons, or any of his “goons” had anything whatsoever to do with the original story.
Interesting she doesn’t deny anything either. And I love that O’Donnell responds with a quote from the extremely pro-choice & pro-birth control agency NOW, a group you know she just loves and they her.
You noticed that too?
O’Donnell didn’t quote NOW, the reporter who wrote that article did. O’Donnell’s quote ends just before NOW is mentioned.
In fairness, I don’t think that the presence or absense of pubic hair on Ms. O’Donnell’s groinal area is relevant to her ability to serve in the Senate.
Well, depends on what spells she uses it for.
It’s something potentially bad about some Rightard - naturally it has to be a Democrat fabrication. Or, possibly, something created by the George Soros Media.
-Joe
It kept McCain out of the White House. If he lives another two years he’ll know to manscape.
O’Donnell did deny the allegations this Friday evening on the Hannity radio show when she called in. She admitted to knowing the guy as an acquaintance but denied everything he alleges besides that she was at the Halloween party with him dressed as a ladybug. She also alleges that the guy was paid off by the democratic party to fabricate this story. This allegation was told to her by one of her advisors according to O’Donnell.
So she admits to all the parts that there were witnesses for, and denies the rest. Has anyone tried that before?
And how exactly did they come by that information?
Anything that could be true, must be true.
In case you haven’t heard yet: O’Donnell defeated! A triumph for the Onanist-American community! Masturbators of the world . . . ermm . . . sorry for interrupting, pray continue.
I’m celebrating like a motherfuck!