We have the Vintage Erotica series from France: Circa 1930, 1940 and 1950. More amusing than erotic.
Check out the “Eveready Harton in Buried Treasure” link at the bottom of that article (the MegaVideo link, not the IMDB one). It’s most definitely NSFW, but it’s hilarious. 
That’s actually a five-decade series, from the 1920s to the 1960s.
You can find it as a collection at http:// www.cduniverse.com/ productinfo.asp?pid=7476580 [link broken as NSFW]
Thanks. For some odd reason, only the three discs I mentioned are to be found locally.
Now that you brought it up…
Anyone really read “The Pearl”? I have a copy; it’s a thick book, just a collection of erotic short stories, but the one thing that strikes me is that all the stories seem to be written by the same author, and he doesn’t seem to have any real sexual experience whatsoever, just a wild, boringly-repeated fantasy.
For example, ALL of his females ejaculate profusely over their male partners. Every time.
Anyone else feel this way about the author?
Isn’t this how you can tell if something is real pornography?
Victorian pornography is interesting, to the extent that most of what survives and gets reprinted is of fairly high literary quality. Especially when compared to modern porn. It also features every “perversion” that can be found in modern writing. Some of it is far more modern in tone than any “real” literature contemporaries were writing. Because flagellation is the “English vice” bruises abound, both for men and women. And everybody “spends” each and every time.
I just realized you may mean that the woman literally squirt rather than merely orgasm. I don’t remember that as being comon anywhere.
AFAIK, all of it was privately printed, mostly anonymously though some under pseudonyms. Young gentlemen knew where to find it and buy it. No stores would touch these books, although I wouldn’t be surprised if back-room deals could be made. Many picture books were produced to accompany these, though these mostly haven’t survived and very few get reprinted. We know a lot less about working class porn. The upper classes achieved true decadence if these books are to be believed.
FWIW, I’ve seen several types of sex acts depicted in rockart.
Look at our pornography. All women are bisexuals who will have sex with people they just met. Do you think that’s a realistic depictation or that all porno movies are written by the same guy? Pornography is about sexual fantasies not reality.
IIRC, there was a 1920s stag film briefly shown during an episode of Boardwalk Empire. It looked like the real thing.
The crab! The crab!
There’s a sex museum in Prague which features (amongst other things) showings of what are supposedly the first pornographic films, complete with piano accompaniment. I can’t Google it at the moment as I’m at work, but I remember it involved two rather mature women going to town on one fellow while another chap watched through the keyhole.
Just like real life. What’s your point?
How is it possible that this thread is 52 posts long and my name hasn’t come up?
Yes, rostfrei, porn is as old as sex. I have the hundreds of films and tens of thousands of pictures to prove it…
If you want to read the most some amazing porn, read “My Secret Life” - 4,000 pages of purely sexual memoirs written by an anonymous Victorian gentleman and first published around the 1880’s - a random passage, plucked blindly:
4,000 pages of it. Quite an eye opener.
Heck, what we’re talking about here is probably older than humanity. I read once that most male sea lions (lacking their own harems) are masturbating voyeurs. And if you’ve ever visited the monkeys in the zoo . . .
Oscar Wilde wrote gay porn involving rent boys and such. Can’t remember the details of the story I read but it was quite porn-y.
Pfft. A slow Tuesday afternoon in Bangkok.
There’s a good one in Shanghai that we’ve visited. Here’s something that’s basically a news story, but I’ll break the link anyway. A questionable photo:
Is it weird that this titillates my archivist proclivities more than my pervy ones?
You work for the Thai Ministry of Tourism. Admit it.
I regret that I can’t remember where I read this but I do recall it being in a more credulous volume than any information I can access in a cursory examination of what’s presently available on Google. I do remember that I encountered the info in my college years long before computers were available to the hoi polloi. And I do think that the volume of false information has increased. Though that, by itself, woudn’t make it accurate.
There are a couple of interesting articles in Wiki and a number of others sites readily accessible with a quick search. Some claim it’s the truth; others are skeptical.
As an aside, noting your user name, there is a brief mention of Germanic tribes using a similar manner of holding their private parts to the side to help avoid damage in battle. So I’m thinking, unlike today when the piecings are done for personal reasons, there may have been cultural, temporal reasons at other times in history.
During the Victorian era the cut of men’s trousers were very tight.
If you think about a time when respectable ladies were not prone to expose any part of their legs (even a peek at an ankle hinted at flirtatiousness), the “legs” of a billiards table were covered to save giving offense and even saying the word “legs” in polite company was verboten, it may make sense that men avoided any hint of their genitals being exposed.
I dunno. A person could speculate even further and wonder if an historian of the times, who wished to be considered credible, would even consider including such private information in a biography.
So perhaps we will never know for sure what were the contents of the noble Prince’s undies. Fact or fantasy, it makes for compelling conjecture.