Coding Error above! I’ll get a mod to erase it!
OH, NO! Instead of making me excited about this film, the new trailer has me worried! Watanabe’s one line (and he is what excited me more than anything besides the awesome director) made him look like a cheesy, cartoon supervillian. I was expecting gritty crime drama. I am worried it may be more “comic bookish” than I had hoped given Nolan’s participation.
Holmes has me worried, much for the same reason. I guess I understand the studios pushing for a love interest in EVERY film made (we had a thread once about films without any romance, I think…), but Batman is NOT a love story. Every bat film had to have a romance angle. Why? How often does Batman REALLY romance? It is all a ploy to keep up the playboy image. I have no problems going into non-fanboy territory for the sake of a good film, but it never results in dynamic cinema. It is always the same. The damsel in distress (with a sprinkling of “tough” because it is a modern world), is preachy or whiney (or both it seems in Holmes’s case). And Batman, who is a cold crime fighting machine, has a chance to show his softer side. And it eats up 1/3 of the film. The “romance” angle could torpedo this film. Though that scene with the arching back was nice, though!
Actually, I disagree with this. Alfred didn’t WANT Bruce to be Batman. He hates Batman. He was secretly thinking “this guy needs to get laid!”
Another worry that reappeared was the concern of too many names above the title. That’s a lot of characters! Especially given that Bruce and Batman effectively count as two different characters.
A lot to fit into two plus hours.
I might have cut Lucious, Scarecrow, and saved Gorden for the sequel (and certainly cut the Holmes character).
And I was really excited about this one. It was the only movie that excited me for the 2005 year…
Worried. Worried. Worried.