Of course, that’s what this loon thought she was doing- making it fair.
I wonder if this idiot even voted. Actually, it would be fun to know how many of the 1/6 traitors voted…
I’m amazed at the number of the January 6 loons who are also sovcit loons.
Who among us is singing right now? 
I most certainly am not. Those people think they are bulletproof. They think they can do/get away with anything.
Donald Trump is a honeypot for nutjobs.
Not surprised at all. Magical thinking? Check. Frothing rage at being denied what they consider their due? Check. “You’re not the boss of me!”? Check. Living inside a conspiracy theory bubble with a Kevlar integument? Check.
A ‘true’ SovCit should not care who is running the government. Of course they are just a bunch of loons, but if they could follow their own…doctrine. It would not matter.
Well, no, if they stayed away from the rest of us and just inflicted their insanity on each other, that would be fine. But they keep interacting with society, to society’s detriment. Have you seen the videos of these idjits’ behavior in traffic stops, or in courtrooms, just as two examples?
They do provide entertainment value.
…or put sugar on his oats…
Yeah, I have. We need a very large polo mallet (Annie Hall reference)
And yes, it is kind of entertaining. But unfortunate for the rest of the judicial department because they have to remain professional around these chuckle heads.
I like your grandfather.
Especially when they get tazed.
They are also, quite literally, deadly dangerous.
The alleged culprit cut down 32 big mature trees on his neighbour’s property to get a better view of New York City.
“The fine per tree is $1,000, so the guy probably thought he was going to just pay a $32,000 fine,” Glickman said. “But the arborist wrote violations to all three parties, 96 in all, and there’s a provision requiring the replanting of like trees ‘of the same size.’” …
“They have to build a road, remove the debris, plant big trees, and water them for two years,” Glickman said. “He quoted $1.5 million. And additional fines total $400,000.” If true, that would bring the grand total price tag for cutting down 32 mature trees to almost $2 million.
‘Haw, haw! I’m going to get a great view for only $32,000! Uh… What?’
The story comes to Yahoo News from a Twitter user named Glickman via a site called northjersey dot com. Do we have any other validation of these numbers? The borough forester involved, named John Linson, would only say that they are “slightly exaggerated.” Actually, if you follow Yahoo’s link, he didn’t say that at all, he didn’t confirm anything except the original citations. At least, I can’t find it.
Is this a municipal jurisdiction? Based on the story, it seems to be. That could be good or bad, city governments can be subject to undue influence, but maybe all the publicity protects against that somewhat.
Edited to add: the NY Post has some better information: it’s a municipal law about replacing the trees, and Glickman is a friend of the owner of the tree property, who is the actual source of the $1.5 million number. They didn’t say how he came up with that number.
How did someone cut down 32 trees without the homeowner noticing?
The property on which the trees reside is large and is on hillsides, apparently, so this section was not in view of the homeowner’s house. He heard the chainsaws in the distance but not in time to save these 32 trees. Possibly more would have been taken down if he hadn’t intervened.
That guy really is special. Not many make it to both the Omnibus Stupid & Evil MFers threads.