On an "Ask the Pedophile" thread

Is there something about the word “topics” that you are having trouble understanding?

No, but clearly there is something about the ridiculous hair-splitting and disingenuous nature of all this that you are having trouble understanding.

This isn’t just about topics. It’s about being told on the one hand that we’re all adults here and need to be prepared for adult subject matter, then Giraffe getting called out for using the word ‘motherfucker’ about someone *who wants to fuck small children and thinks 5-year-olds want to fuck him and that the laws should be changed to accommodate that. *

Whatever. I sense that you understand what I meant 100% and are being deliberately obtuse.

Yes

I don’t know…probably the same thing you’re having trouble understanding about “adult sites”. Generally “adult sites” don’t protect people from naughty words.

Or, if you’re going to stick with the bullshit distraction about “topics”, how about “Have you ever vandalized Wikipedia?” as a topic? Hm? Not “How do I,.” or “Let’s go do it…” just… “have you?”

Wow.

At what point will you learn that when you’re in a deep hole, you don’t keep digging?

We do keep track of warnings. We usually don’t keep track of notes. This is a case where if we’d seen he’d been written up that many times I think he’d have gotten warned for it. That’s something for us to take a second looked at.

This conclusion is pretty much what I’m arguing. I know nobody wants him to bring up the subject. I’m saying that by going after him pre-emptively, people wind up giving him an opening and that prevents us from taking a tougher stance.
Having seen seen Cesario has already been told four times that he needs to stop it, though, I think he’s been given more than enough notice and as far as I’m concerned notes and advisement won’t cut it in the future.

C’mon guys, you have banned people at the drop of a hat before and stood in front of the rash of complaints about it because they were liked people. You don’t need to defend your case or go to appeals. Just ban the dumb thing and be done with it. Say you found out he had a sock. Whatever. Nobody is going to fight you for it.

Pre-School janitor’s assisatant?

So it seems that Cesario is welcome to post on any other topics, but if posters see him introducing the topic of pedophilia into threads that are not discussing that topic, it would be appropriate to report his post rather than engaging him in discussion.

Yeah, well, that, I guess. I mean, if you are into being reasonable and that stuff. Don’t you have a pitchfork to sharpen like everybody else?

This has been asked and not answered over and over again here so let’s try again, maybe you can blow my mind for me again.

Reread what you said (what I quoted) and please explain (because, you know, we’re all just too dense to see) why is it different with a childfucker (can’t say motherfucker, natch!) but it could be done to someone who talked about bondage with grown adults (aka EvilCaptor)?

Now that you realize just how many times he’s been told, how hard is it just to send him a PM like you all did to EC and tell him that he’s not allowed to do it anymore? Instead of hoping he’ll stop (he’s shown you that your warnings mean nothing to him) maybe you could make him stop?

There aren’t any children here, so probably not.

I’ll answer this. It’s not hard, and Marley is full of shit.

[MeanOldLady receives a billion warnings and temporary suspension for calling a moderator full of shit, meanwhile Cesario posts repeatedly about what should be his inalienable right to fuck toddlers, and continues to ignore warnings, if any]

Tsk, tsk. You must frame it like this: Marley’s POSTS are full of shit.

Ha! I actually tried to go back and edit it to read “and Marley['s post] is full of shit,” but I missed the edit window.

O it wouldn’t matter. They’ve suspended people for what they put before they edited it out. As Tuba likes to remind us, they can suspend you for whatever reason they want to at any time. Apparently, she’s come a long way with pedophilia since the days when she broke the law regarding one because although they have the ability to ban him, they choose not to

It’s pretty obvious from this thread that an ask the pedo thread would be a bad idea, and that Cesario’s continued presence on this board is highly disruptive. I don’t see any value in his continued presence. Maybe he could get a rule where he doesn’t post about pedophilia again, ever. Christ, Reeder had a rule limiting his Bush bashing threads, and was banned for violating it.

I’m not calling for his banning at all. I’m using the Pit to engage another poster whose behavior is pissing me off – ideally, he’ll see how gross he’s being and stop. I think that’s more constructive than simply ignoring his squicky posts and hoping the mods deal with him, even if it does give him attention.

Then why is Claude Remains suspended?