On Feminism

I was most definitely NOT restating that claim. Or at least, I was not just re-asserting it. Rather, I was asking an entirely reasonable question… you believe one thing to be true about the world, I believe a different thing to be true. Assuming we are both honest people arguing in good faith, the question we should be asking is: “how can we objectively determine which of us is correct? what test can we run? what data can we look at?”. That’s the question I’m asking.

As far as I can tell, your evidence consists of:
(1) Your (claimed) life experience
(2) Your overall summary of feminists who post on twitter

My evidence consists of :
(1) My (claimed) life experience
(2) The (claimed) life experience of various other posters in this thread

So we could argue back and forth forever… I could make comments about how it’s always the extreme views that stand out in a medium like twitter, you could respond back, etc. But what would be much better would be some actual research, a survey, whatever, because then we would have some actual real evidence.

Have I ever said anything, in this thread or any other, about MRAs?

Sure, but in this case, the difference is very relevant. If I belong to an organization, one that I consciously chose to join, then I’m making an implicit claim that I agree with at least some of the positions or aims of that organization. If people in that organization’s hierarchy do or say ridiculous things, there’s at least a reasonable argument that if I don’t denounce those things, I can be assumed to support them. If enough people in the organization’s hierarchy do or say enough ridiculous things, then the fact that I continue to be a member of that organization is, again, at least arguably an implicit endorsement of those things.

But that’s very different from just generally identifying with a movement. That’s not something you can join. It’s not something you can quit. And it’s not something that has a hierarchy, where specific people clearly speak for it. Someone high up in Greenpeace speaks for Greenpeace members in a way that no single feminist, or even no ten thousand feminists on twitter, speak for all feminists.

I am not Trinopus and do not speak for him (her?). But I do invite you to respond to the part of my post discussing what reactions feminists should have to the higher male suicide rate, and what reactions you believe they do have.

Just to be clear, you believe that many of the people posting in this thread are “hateful extremists”?

It has nothing to do with nature – sadly more men make risky choices in life.

Which is why feminism still has such a long way to go to achieve equality.

That’s true. Also the reason men die before women and gets thrown in jail more that women. Etc. also the reason there are fewer women in leadership positions and in certain STEM professions. Different aspirations, different goals, different choices.

If I hold a door open for a man I am well mannered, If I hold a door open for a woman I am a male chauvinist pig, It has happened more than once and has me beat

Perhaps you ought learn not to stare at her ass so obviously as she walks past.

I’ve heard this complaint more than once, and it honestly has me flummoxed. I live in the People’s Republic of Portland, one of the weirder and arguably more left-leaning cities in the US. I hold doors for people pretty often–men, women, and gender-variant alike–and I present as an obvious man. Never once in my entire life has anyone ever taken me to task for it. Ever.

I’m not trying to deny or minimize your experience, but I’m just amazed that it’s such a common occurrence for you.

I do not know if it has anything to do with the wrong time for a woman but I have seen a man being scolded for offering his seat to a woman, she was most indignant

Weird. I have the complete opposite experience. Every person, man or woman, looks at me really weird when I hold the door open, sweeping off my fedora and bowing with a “Milady!” as I hold the door open for him or her.

It is usually a woman’s eye’s that grabs my attention

Do it right and no one will bat an eye. Hold with the right hand, sweep with the left. Geez.

Oh, you silver tongued charmer… lol.

Did he offer his seat or a seat in his lap? The difference is subtle but important.

Oh you silver tongued charmer. NO I did not say tongue

Thank you. The public must be educated about the discrimination faced by male victims of domestic violence. Unfortunately anyone who raises this issue is going to be subject to many personal attacks.

In USA this is the greatest violation of Human Rights since Slavery. I know the article is about UK.

That’s an excellent point.

That… not so much.

Yeah, I’ve never seen this ever, or heard of it happening, ever. Almost sounds like the kind of made-up story MRA types tell each other. I don’t know why these women would behave like this to T.M.

Oh wait, I think I figured it out.

One thing where I agree with feminists is that indeed they have plurality of population and a majority of those not indifferent to gender. The best results show that 28% of people are feminists and 5% are antifeminists. The rest are indifferent.

Thank you – anyone who does not share society’s biases will be abused by society.

If feminists are 28% of the population, does that mean that feminists don’t share society’s biases and are therefore abused by society?

Actually, most people in USA and UK are very sympathetic to feminist ideals.