On the Reality of the Existentialist Lifestyle

Aah, thehellwithit. If you don’t have the decency to take this crap to the proper forum, I will.

Well, after that - let me get back to the OP’s questions:

Yes, it is - and I wouldn’t equate the two choices, or even say they are on a continuum like you’re suggesting. Living according to the ideals proposed by Sartre is intentional living - not nihilistic at all. Just because you are free to create your own meaning doesn’t mean there is no meaning - far from it.

I live an existential life by being responsible for my choices, by being open to experience, by trusting my own judgment - being open to my own feelings, by living as much in the present as I can, by being as creative as I can, by valuing my contact with both other people and the world around me. I espouse anarcho-syndicalist politics because they seem most in keeping with my worldview. I choose charities that generally serve to raise people up and allow them to do things for themselves.

“Lack of direction” =/= “existentialism”, IMO. Directionlessness is what you have before you create your own meaning. Not to make too much of this - but angst is pretty normal. It’s what you do after the angst that makes you an existentialist. Why lie awake and fearful? What do you fear? That you’ve made the wrong choices? But how absurd - what makes them wrong?

Yes - and (and lots of people forget this one) that we are, ultimately, not responsible for anyone else’s. The burden of others’ expectations is all in their own heads.

We can try and take responsibility for things that aren’t really our fault. That’s a common one.

It is comparable to religion in that both are belief systems, yes, but there isn’t really any dogma to follow in existentialism, so to me it doesn’t have the flavour of a religion, even an atheist one like Buddhism.