Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic?

[Czarcasm]

@SeldomSeen

I don’t know that the military establishment should be considered a good source of medical advice, but when I was enlisted (a good many years ago) they had their own treatment programs and means. The Navy, in its wisdom declared a person “cured” after two years of sobriety. At that point the restrictions were lifted, the slate was wiped clean, fliers who had been grounded due to drinking problems could return to flying, security clearances were re-established, etc. In the eyes of the military powers-that-be, if one could stay sober for two years, chances were good he could remain so for the rest of his enlistment.

Thank you for the military definition-clear, concise and reachable.
What about those of you who support AAA? What would it take to declare someone cured of alcoholism? The answer to this question is the answer to the OP’s question, in my opinion.

[Bloodless_Turnip]

It’s an interesting question Czarcasm. When I went to family visitation while a family member was in rehab, I heard a lot of stories.

One, where a woman had been sober for years (around 15 IIRC) and had gone “off the wagon” spectacularly. She said it was like she had never stopped, that time picked right back up where she left off drinking.

This may be be why groups like AA stress that alcoholics can never drink again.

[Czarcasm]

@Bloodless_Turnip

AMA paper on it is here.

I 100% disagree with them that it is a disease btw. Not that it matters

I don’t think any of that answers my question, though.

[Czarcasm]

@Bloodless_Turnip

It’s an interesting question Czarcasm. When I went to family visitation while a family member was in rehab, I heard a lot of stories.

One, where a woman had been sober for years (around 15 IIRC) and had gone “off the wagon” spectacularly. She said it was like she had never stopped, that time picked right back up where she left off drinking.

This may be be why groups like AA stress that alcoholics can never drink again.

Would that mean that if someone diagnosed as an alcoholic manages to have a drink once in a while and doesn’t fall off the wagon, AAA would consider them cured?

[Oakminster]

@Czarcasm

Would that mean that if someone diagnosed as an alcoholic manages to have a drink once in a while and doesn’t fall off the wagon, AAA would consider them cured?

Probably not, but they might be eligible for emergency road service.

[Bloodless_Turnip]

I don’t see the word “cure” listed anywhere in the AMA documents nor the NIH documents, in relation to alcoholism.

Hold the phone:

4. Can alcoholism be cured?

No, alcoholism cannot be cured at this time. Even if an alcoholic hasn’t been drinking for a long time, he or she can still suffer a relapse. Not drinking is the safest course for most people with alcoholism.

From here.

[RedFury]

@Czarcasm

Thank you for the military definition-clear, concise and reachable.
What about those of you who support AAA? What would it take to declare someone cured of alcoholism? The answer to this question is the answer to the OP’s question, in my opinion.

According to AA – have no clue about the American Automobile Association has to say on the subject – you are never “cured.” Guess that makes an ex-smoker for 20 years still a smoker.

Disease. Powerless. Healing up to whimsical Higher Power. Must never forget.

[Czarcasm]

@Bloodless_Turnip

I don’t see the word “cure” listed anywhere in the AMA documents nor the NIH documents, in relation to alcoholism.

Hold the phone:

From here.

Once again, that doesn’t describe what they mean by “cure”-it only says that a cure isn’t possible. It’s like asking someone to describe a dog to you, and the best they can do is describe an elephant and say “That ain’t it.”

[RedFury]

Why Do Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers?

…Moderate drinking, which is defined as one to three drinks per day, is associated with the lowest mortality rates in alcohol studies. Moderate alcohol use (especially when the beverage of choice is red wine) is thought to improve heart health, circulation and sociability, which can be important because people who are isolated don’t have as many family members and friends who can notice and help treat health problems.

But why would abstaining from alcohol lead to a shorter life? It’s true that those who abstain from alcohol tend to be from lower socioeconomic classes, since drinking can be expensive. And people of lower socioeconomic status have more life stressors — job and child-care worries that might not only keep them from the bottle but also cause stress-related illnesses over long periods. (They also don’t get the stress-reducing benefits of a drink or two after work.)

But even after controlling for nearly all imaginable variables — socioeconomic status, level of physical activity, number of close friends, quality of social support and so on — the researchers (a six-member team led by psychologist Charles Holahan of the University of Texas at Austin) found that over a 20-year period, mortality rates were highest for those who were not current drinkers, regardless of whether they used to be alcoholics, second highest for heavy drinkers and lowest for moderate drinkers. (Watch TIME’s Video “Taste Test: Beer with Extra Buzz.”)

The sample of those who were studied included individuals between ages 55 and 65 who had had any kind of outpatient care in the previous three years. The 1,824 participants were followed for 20 years. One drawback of the sample: a disproportionate number, 63%, were men. Just over 69% of the abstainers died during the 20 years, 60% of the heavy drinkers died and only 41% of moderate drinkers died.

These are remarkable statistics. Even though heavy drinking is associated with higher risk for cirrhosis and several types of cancer (particularly cancers in the mouth and esophagus), heavy drinkers are less likely to die than people who don’t drink, even if they never had a problem with alcohol. One important reason is that alcohol lubricates so many social interactions, and social interactions are vital for maintaining mental and physical health. As I pointed out last year, nondrinkers show greater signs of depression than those who allow themselves to join the party…

Your choice…

[Czarcasm]

@RedFury

Why Do Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers?

Your choice…

I choose to stay on topic.

[Acsenray]

@RedFury

According to AA – have no clue about the American Automobile Association has to say on the subject – you are never “cured.” Guess that makes an ex-smoker for 20 years still a smoker.

Disease. Powerless. Healing up to whimsical Higher Power. Must never forget.

Is thatthe upshot of AA’s teachings? That you are powerless and therefore you aren’t responsible for anything you do?

[guizot]

@RedFury

More on the dominance, cost and ineffectiveness of 12 step treatment: We’re addicted to rehab. It doesn’t even work.

A good example of confusing correlation with causation. Most rehabs don’t work simply because they’re too short. It doesn’t really matter whether they use 12-step models or not. They use it because they think it might give some credence to a place which is often just an absurdly priced resort in disguise. And most of the people who go to short rehabs don’t realize this. They think in 30 days they’re going to magically reverse decades of abuse. (Actually, it’s usually their families who think this, and who pay for it.) Also, using a place like Passages of Malibu as an example is not a very good rhetorical strategy. That place is such a blatant a fraud, it embarrasses even the more subtle frauds.

[Fear_Itself]

@Acsenray

Is thatthe upshot of AA’s teachings? That you are powerless and therefore you aren’t responsible for anything you do?

That’s not what AA teaches. You are powerless to control your drinking. That is all, you don’t get a pass for bad behavior.

[OneMissedPost]

@Czarcasm

Would that mean that if someone diagnosed as an alcoholic manages to have a drink once in a while and doesn’t fall off the wagon, AAA would consider them cured?

No,

I think AA believes that alcoholics are not allowed to drink. The fact that they had a drink would mean that they are not cured. If they were truly cured, they would be fine staying away from all alcohol and not drinking at all. Having a drink would be considered a relapse in their eyes…

Again, this is what I think. Someone should google it.

I think what happens is they assume that if an alcoholic has a drink, that person will not be able to control his or her drinking (one drink will lead to more drinks).

@Fear_Itself

That’s not what AA teaches. You are powerless to control your drinking. That is all, you don’t get a pass for bad behavior.

And that you need to give yourself over to a higher power in order to control your drinking.

[Acsenray]

@Fear_Itself

That’s not what AA teaches. You are powerless to control your drinking. That is all, you don’t get a pass for bad behavior.

I’m going to ask for clarification because this seems to be a bit ambiguous.

1. Does AA teach that an alcoholic is completely powerless to stay away from alcohol and therefore has no ability to stay sober and therefore cannot be held responsible if he takes a drink? If so, then I don’t see the point of any treatment or recovery program.

Or –

2. That an alcoholic is powerless in the sense that once he takes a drink, he is unable to drink in moderation?

[Fear_Itself]

@Acsenray

I’m going to ask for clarification because this seems to be a bit ambiguous.

1. Does AA teach that an alcoholic is completely powerless to stay away from alcohol and therefore has no ability to stay sober and therefore cannot be held responsible if he takes a drink?

No.

2. That an alcoholic is powerless in the sense that once he takes a drink, he is unable to drink in moderation?

Yes.

[OneMissedPost]

@Acsenray

2. That an alcoholic is powerless in the sense that once he takes a drink, he is unable to drink in moderation?

This.

[Typo_Negative]

@Acsenray

Is thatthe upshot of AA’s teachings? That you are powerless and therefore you aren’t responsible for anything you do?

It seems that you may be unfamiliar with what the steps are. This may help(this is NA’s version, but the others are very similar, only one or two words changed): It is pretty well accepted that you cannot take the 1st step if you currently intoxicated.

Step 1 - We admitted we were powerless over our addiction - that our lives had become unmanageable
Step 2 - Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity
Step 3 - Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood God
Step 4 - Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves
Step 5 - Admitted to God, to ourselves and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs
Step 6 - Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character
Step 7 - Humbly asked God to remove our shortcomings
Step 8 - Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all
Step 9 - Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others
Step 10 - Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it
Step 11 - Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood God, praying only for knowledge of God’s will for us and the power to carry that out
Step 12 - Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to other addicts, and to practice these principles in all our affairs

In our program, it is not enough to simply stop using the drug. The NA Basic Texts states “Simple abstinence is not our goal. Our goal is recovery as experienced through the 12 steps”.

Put simply, you can be sober without being in recovery. You cannot be in recovery without being sober.

[raindog]

@dalej42

AA is a useless cult. I couldn’t drink like I did when I was younger, because I’ve got to get up in the morning and show up at work.

This is one of the most ignorant posts I’ve read in recent memory.

There are millions of people who believe that AA saved their lives.

Millions.

[Typo_Negative]

I don’t blame anyone for not getting or not believing in AA, NA or whatnot.
A lot of it does seem counter-intuitive.

I just remember that it’s not *for them *to get or believe in.

OK, WTF!!!
Is it coincidence that ads I see above this reply box are :
Binge Drinking Problems?
#1 Addictions Rehab Center
Alcoholism -Gain Control