I know this wasn’t posed to me, but I feel like I can aswer some of these questions. Although he was offensive to many people, I think he has a point. First, personal experiences means nothing with regard to their true gender indentity. Just cause they feel like women doesn’t mean they really are.
Contrarian view? I don’t know where you live but Clothahump’s view certainly isn’t contrarian. In the US, many (if not most) people believe homosexuality is wrong, Do you really think they except the arguments for being transgender? I think not. That doesn’t make them morally or objectively right, but it does make Clothahump’s view the dominant one. It’s also worth noting that it doesn’t make all of them stupid, bigots, or blidly religious. He doesn’t need to make the case for why male/femaleness is inheirent in genetics, you need to prove why it is not; and you need to do it without comparing it to things like Klinefelter’s syndrome (which are not analogous).
As I explained before, the burden is on you. Please stop comparing transgender persons to homosexuals. It is not the same thing. I believe there is an objective truth that one can either accept or reject. Transgender persons choose to reject it. In the absence of a genetic disorder, you are born a man or a woman and you will stay that way until you die. You can also be born hetero or homosexual. I know plenty of gay people who dated the opposite sex until they realized they were gay. That doesn’t mean they suddenly became gay, they were always gay, they just choose to reject reality. They are well within their rights to do so. But, comparing that to someone who feels they should have been born as a another sex is faulty.
I would love for someone to explain to me how being transgender is different from someone who has Apotemnophilia. This doesn’t really explain the condition fully, so I will elaborate. Many people who have this disorder are nuts, many others sincerely feel as though they should not have been born with certain body parts. So I have a few questions for anyone that would like to answer them.
*How is someone who feels they should have been born without a penis different from someone who feels they shouldn’t have been born with a leg?
Why is it that the first person can undergo surgical procedures to aline their mental image of themselves with their physical, while the second person can’t?
Why is one person “normal” while the other is crazy (if you feel they are crazy)?
When does someone who is born a man (but, feels like they should be a woman) become a woman?
Is it when they come to terms with this fact?
After they start dressing and acting like a woman?
After the surgery?
What if they are uncertain of what they should have been born as, do they temporarily transcend gender indentity?*
In short, my point is that I don’t think you can change your gender through surgery. I don’t say all of that to say someone shouldn’t have the right to do what ever they want to make themselves happy (or that it is morally wrong). Just that it is very frustrating when people try to say the objective standard for gender indentity we’ve used forever is wrong because a few people feel their genes are faulty. Sorry, but I disagree.