According to a report by the National Science Foundation.
What is it about America that makes so many of us dumber than a shit sandwich? I could understand if I saw these numbers from people in backwards third world countries where most people haven’t had access to a K through 12 education, but what’s our excuse? :smack:
As disappointing as this is, are we supposed to think this is something new (or that this is news)? We’ve got this weird concept of religion in this country. Well, not all of us, but a lot. It’s really no more complicated than that.
Well that, and how lacking in any practical effect on everyday life the answers to some of these questions are. I’ve been hitting the gym 4 times a week for the past year, and the big bang has come up in conversation with other weightlifters exactly zero times. People don’t care, so they don’t know.
So if the theory that our Universe came about because of the interaction with two other Universes is true, will we call it the Big Ejaculation Theory? Or the Big Baby Theory? That whole ‘cosmic flow’ thing has me wondering.
Yeah. I’ve brought that up many times in other threads. Neither of those things has much practical use in everyday life, but it does sort of breed a culture of ignorance.
OK, now cue the post where someone comes in and brings up antibiotics…
The evolution thing I can understand (grok, not necessarily condone). But the Big Bang would seem to be a perfect match for “God said, ‘Let there be Light, and there was Light.’” Seems more a matter of science classes not even touching on it in the first place.
Thankfully I attended school in Phoenix, AZ. We learned what I think was pretty straight stuff.
The worst I had to endure was a self-hating white apologist and a photography teacher who’d occasionally remind us that “there aren’t any atheists in foxholes.”
Exactly; America is highly religious, and is therefore intellectually crippled since religion is incompatible with truth and rationality.
That would be a reference to evolution, not the big Bang; and to the fact that bacteria evolve resistance to antibiotics. Evolution is quite important.
I worked for a guy like this once. Pretty smart guy, family man, Senior VP in a large company. But he couldn’t give up the God concept.
He didn’t show it much, but when it came out he really tooted that horn. During my first annual employee evaluation (which normally takes less than 30 minutes), we got on this tangent about the universe, and he started with a simple statement that he “didn’t believe” in dinosaurs, because they weren’t mentioned in the Bible. :dubious: Then we went on and he really showed his beliefs - Fossils were a hoax, The Universe really was created in seven days, the whole enchilada.
Now, I like a good fight, and I am more than willing to give a fool enough rope to hang himself with in an argument, but this guy had biblical counter arguments for every (valid) scientific point I made. And he really believed himself.
That review took over three hours. At the end, I basically stopped him by making him listen to the PA announcements, as the receptionist had been paging us both for about 20 minutes because neither one of us would answer the phone.
Evolution makes sense. However, the Big Bang is totally counterintuitive. Once upon a time there was this teensy weensy infinitely dense speck in the middle of nothing (oh wait - there is no middle!) and one day for no apparent reason it exploded into everything in the universe that exists today and this universe is forever expanding into nothing and there was no space or time before any of this happened and there is nothing outside of it and all of your questions about it are meaningless. No wonder the response of the average laymanoid to this is “Yeah, right”. I concede that the cosmologists know more than I do, but this is damned hard to swallow.
You know, I would disagree with the second statement being true. It wasn’t an explosion, and it wasn’t big. Definitely a false statement. In fact, the portion of the sample who thought that statement was true were, in fact, the scientifically illiterate portion of the study.
And, to be precise, human beings as we know them today did not develop from other animals. That isn’t how it works. The humans we know today might all be members of the sole surviving line of hominids from a larger pool of species, and that line might have originated from a series of mutation involving from “other animals” but that is not the same thing. Humans that we know of today were the offspring of other humans. Simplification of science into such silly single statements is not a good measure of the understanding of the reader. One of the disagreements might be a bit pedantic, sure, but the first one I mention is simply accurate reading of the question, and a reasonable understanding of cosmology.
The “big explosion” question was a little sloppy, but not the question about evolution. Still, do you really think the numbers would have been different if you had written the questions? I doubt it.
Look, I know there’s no changing your opinion, but this says more about religion in American than in general. According to some other numbers, 16% of the US is nonreligious, for example, while it’s 5% of Ireland. Yet 40-45% of Americans believe in evolution while 70% of the Irish do.
Most creationists will say they believe in microevolution (non-camouflaged animals get eaten), but deny macroevolution (we are evolved from a primate ancestor).
They’re not dinosaurs, they’re Jesus horses!
Good point. The statement presented comes across as incredibly specific and disingenuous. If they said “the universe was created by the Big Bang,” I wonder if the numbers wouldn’t be a bit higher. With these kinds of questions, you can seriously alter the results by changing the wording slightly, or even by changing to negative from positive. The best surveys ask different questions about the same thing. They shouldn’t ask “Do you believe in evolution? Yes/No” without asking about things like descent from a common ancestor or adaptations or selection.