Continuing the discussion from MPSIMS has gotten a minor rename to “Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share”:
IMHO had polls, and MPSIMS did not.
The best part of SDMB forums is that they are not based on the subject, but on how the topic is discussed. So, instead of a forum for all the threads on one topic (for example, dinosaurs), you could have dinosaur thread in GQ (what did dinosaurs smell like), GD (should we clone dinosaurs), IMHO (which is scariest dinosaur), MPSIMS (how I found my first dinosaur fossil), BBQPit (dinosaurs pooping on my car again).
You read the forum that had the format you preferred. But then the comingling of subjects made it interesting to read, because you never knew what would be discussed. Sites that sequestered threads by subject matter ended up stagnating because there was little cross pollination.
The forum changes that irked me were the creation of Cafe Society, Game Room, Thread Games, Politics, etc. I understand why they were created (let’s not relitigate that), but I think those forums weaken the eclecticity of the site.
And it has another negative effect. Ever notice how sometimes a topic always pull threads into the same old thread rehash? It’s partially due to posters thinking about forums as subject-based, rather than format-based. For example, the mere existence of a Politics forum makes it harder to separate a factual question about politics vs a debate about politics vs opinions about politics vs observations about politics vs politics in general. Without the clear separation, all politics thread have an inertia that leads them into politics in general, losing the focus of a particular forum’s format.
I’m not advocating for any particular change, but wanted to give this old-timers view of this site. Anyway, I’m splitting this off the original thread, because it’s way too hijacky.