I don’t have any direct experience with Duke’s offerings, but as a teacher I have had a few students over the years who have attended programs like this, and my son was a “counselor” (that wasn’t the actual job title, but I forget what was) at one when he was in college.
The kids seem to have a good time, IF they’re the sorts who like these kinds of courses and IF they have a certain degree of maturity. Which most, but not all, do.
I would be surprised if being in one of these programs has much to do with college admissions. Students who achieved a lot in high school don’t need to fall back on something they did in MS, and if you haven’t done much of anything since middle school you probably aren’t going to get a boost based on something you did back when you were younger. But I have no evidence either way.
One thing I thought I’d mention; may have posted about this before. I had a student a few years back whose parents were quite invested in him being supremely gifted. They hooked up with a prestigious college known for these kinds of summer programs and having a general interest in identifying gifted students (it was NOT Duke); I don’t recall whether the parents sought out the school or whether the school sought out the kid.
The school did a whole battery of tests on him and sent the parents a summary that concluded that yes, the kid was gifted, should take their courses, attend their summer programs, etc, etc, etc. So far so OK.
The problem was that when we looked closely at the results (the parents shared the report with us), the evidence didn’t exactly back up the summary. Most of his scores and subscores put him in nice solid percentiles–88, 82, 91, like that–but there were very few for which he was in the top 5% let alone the top 1%–and there were just as many which put him in the middle of the pack or even below.
What frosted my doughnuts the most was a note on one of the subtests: “Technically speaking, [name] scored at the 7th percentile, but that was clearly not an accurate reflection of his true ability. So we continued with the test anyway and he would have been in the 98th percentile had we been able to count it!”*
I don’t know. It smacked a lot of “give the families what they want to hear, then profit!” I don’t say this has a bearing on your case at all, and again, this wasn’t Duke…but fair or not, it kind of soured me on these programs in general.
*Explanation for my discomfort: These kinds of tests typically have you ask a long series of questions until the child reaches a certain number of errors–missing three in a row, say, or five overall, something like that. At that point you stop the test, count the number of correct answers, and convert it into a percentile. What evidently happened with this boy was that he hit that number of errors very early on in the process, whether through carelessness, misunderstanding, or what. You really should not continue the test at that point, as the scales are all predicated on stopping when the cutoff is reached; and you *certainly *should not report a hypothetical score as it has no meaning. For all we know, if we’d allowed the other kids who reached the error threshold at the seventh percentile to keep going, they too would have reached the same score he did, and then the percentile becomes much, much lower.