I’m about to turn 65, and have been approved for a Medicare advantage program with Kaiser. Yesterday I received a form from them giving me the opportunity to opt out of their system of binding arbitration for settling disputes.
My understanding is that binding arbitration agreements generally favor the big organization versus the individual. One reason is regulatory capture: the organization uses the same arbitrators over and over, so the arbitrators end up identifying with the organization, and maybe even being dependent on it.
It seems to me the main advantage I’d gain from arbitration is the ability to represent myself in relatively small disputes. That is, I wouldn’t have to have a lawyer for an arbitration hearing. The main disadvantage is that I’d lose the ability to have a dispute heard by a jury and a truly independent judge.
I should say that I’ve never sued anyone, and I don’t anticipate ever doing it. Regardless, there’s always a possibility of a dispute, such as a billing issue or a malpractice claim. I want to protect myself.
I should also say that several years ago my father had a billing dispute with Kaiser that went to arbitration, and we were unhappy with the result. I’ll share the details if anyone asks.