Potentially, if the vamps harm (or threaten to harm) Mr. Scruffy there’s a strong chance Belkar could shake off the Domination and kick some vampire butt. Remember what happened to the desert slavers when they tried it?
Mind you, it might not end well for him - his prophesied demise is long overdue by this point.
I get this feeling too. Greg’s curiosity is piqued, and he is deep enough in the memory not to react to the ‘We WON!’ exclamation in the last panel. The setup is that the dead miners were ‘probably all bound for Hel’ before they were raised, so there is possible exposition coming that puts Hel in a bad light.
I have a feeling it’s going to turn out that Durkon’s dad didn’t actually die in battle, like we saw in the crayon flashback, and is in Hel’s realm. But I can’t see how that would make a difference to Greg, or matter at all in the current situation.
Yeah, I can’t see Greg being upset that Hel is hellish - he is apparently a creation of Hel if I remember correctly, so unless it turns out that Hel’s realm is actually milk and cookies all the time, I doubt that any revelation about conditions there would turn him against his mistress.
Food for thought: these five dwarves have first-hand experience of Hel.
I have no idea how that could possibly be relevant, but I have no idea how any of this is relevant. Just throwing this out there in case it does become a plot point.
Something I noticed, which I’m sure is just a coincidence: Two of my favorite webcomics released strips today based on familial ties stronger than blood based on being brought back from the dead.
Schlock Mercenary (linked to a few days ago for context: The short lady is the top religious leader of the four-armed characters’ species, and the crowds in the background are victims of a mining accident being revived by a relief effort led by the taller four-armed character).
I’ve spent the last few hours going back through the current book, and I found something else about the Five Miners that’s nice:
They feel strongly that Sigdi shouldn’t have to pay them back for anything. “My honor will be deeply insulted if you try to give me money for [the dress] later.”
Just a theory. But Durkula has made a point that he knows everything about Durkon. Maybe this is Durkon’s way of telling Durkula that he doesn’t; that Durkon has memories that he’s buried so deeply Durkula wasn’t even aware they existed and didn’t look for them.
This has been foreshadowed. Durkon “wrote” the introduction to one of the books. In his introduction he revealed that he’s not naturally dutiful. He just behaves dutifully so he can be assured of going to Valhalla when he dies - where he says he plans on doing all of the partying he has denied himself in life.
That said, even if this is true I don’t see how revealing it gives Durkon any advantage over Durkula.