That’s an … interesting point. I would think that whether a vampire’s ingested blood is his or the donor’s would be up to the DM. Or is that actually covered in the manuals?
(I enjoy the comic, but my experience with D&D is limited to one campaign I played while working at Boy Scout camp in 1992.)
Well, ingested blood certainly wasn’t “part of the corpse at the time of death”. So the question is just whether what’s in Durkon’s veins is all ingested blood, or if there’s any of the original left. But there never would have been very much of it left, since the cause of death would have been blood loss to begin with.
Hel needs the demigod priests to break the tie and seemed confident that they would vote in her favor yet the priest of Baldur is apparently unable to reach them (because the ushers are all dead or whatever). Despite this obviously being more mechanizations from Hel/Durkon, I fail to see how this works in Hel’s favor. Presumably, if the demigod priests were in the room, this could be over already.
We’re assuming the demi-god priests are missing because of Durkon. But possibly, they’re missing because Belkar got back sooner than expected, and has been thinning out the ranks of Durkon’s new thralls off-panel.
Unless he landed in a vat of healing potion juice, I doubt the Belkster could take even one thrall, assuming Durkula was able to raise any.
Although I super love the like “tell Hel to go to herself”
We only saw Durkon attack the stone guy and they are “non-theistic” and have no protection from a god (which is why Durkon could kill them). I would suspect that the demigod patrons would be under divine protection since they are technically voting members of the Godsmoot.
I am tentatively assuming that Durkula’s attacks on the stone-people were not part of the original plan since he had to query the poor exarch to learn that they were not divinely protected. If part of his plan hinged on a lack of ushers, that’s a pretty big if to leave to chance. I’m grasping at straws and hoping this is the pebble in the gears of Durkula’s gambit and that he didn’t realize that the high priests would rely on the ushers to act as messengers since they can’t leave the voting space.
I was wondering the same thing - I bet that Durkula simply likes to kill people if he can get away with it, and secondarily we know that Hel has immense trouble finding any “followers” with class levels, especially cleric levels. So he might have a secondary objective of creating additional high-ish level followers of Hel when possible (just as backup in case the world-ending primary objective doesn’t work out). In this case, though, he may have interfered with ending the world right now by doing so. Then again, it could be part of the plan, since he almost showed up too late to the vote by taking time to drain those other clerics.
ISTM that vamping the priest of a Demigod wouldn’t change the vote - though I suppose it could keep a few no votes from entering the arena. During the vote process, the priest appears to be a mere conduit. Vamping a demigod priest sounds like something that would be defined as an attack anyway and therefore against Godsmoot rules. Unless it were executed by one of the stone priests and therefore technically permissible?
Which Demigods will show up? Will we have heard of them or are they PCs from eras past? What’s with that force field: is it one way?
Hel may be LE, but that doesn’t mean Durkevil is: “A cleric’s alignment must be within one step of his deity’s”. Also, even if she manipulates the rules for her own ends, I don’t think that prohibits her from being NE.
A wooden stake through the heart instantly kills the vampire. To keep it that way, you chop off the head and fill the mouth with wafers. Or destroy the body in some other manner. Vampire :: d20srd.org