I was reading a local story of a car wreck, and one of the injuries to a passenger was the removal of his spleen. I have read this many times, and it got me wondering what other organs could be removed from a person, and leave said person still able to live a normal life.
I offer the following:
The spleen.
One kidney.
One lung.
The appendix.
The gallbladder.
What else?
I think if you had all these removed you would live, but would not have a “normal” life by any means. Especially not without your kidney, lung, liver or intestine.
It’s certainly possible to have a normal life after removal of a kidney or a portion of your liver through donation. The major limitation on kidney donors is avoiding high contact sports. No dietary or other activity restrictions apply unless they were in place prior to donation.
If you mean one person losing all the mentioned organs, well that’s another story.
Why no high-contact sports? Is it to protect the remaining kidney?
I was talking about if you removed all removable organs, since the OP seemed to want to know just how far you could go and still lead a normal life. I figured those were the most important “removable” parts. Also IANAD but I have known two people with one kidney (one was born like that, one had it removed) and both seemed kind of more frail than other people in that hard to describe sort of way but do you think that’s more because neither was “normal” to begin with?