The story I heard is that the Cyrillic alphabet was created by Catholic monks who’d travelled to Russia, but hadn’t written in so long that they forgot how the Latin alphabet was written. Considering my source for this, I find this explaination extremely suspect. So what’s the Dope on this?
More: History of the Russian Language
Note well: Cyrillic comes from the Greek alphabet.
(Which, of course, is the true alphabet. It’s the one that actually starts with alpha and beta.)
IANAP, but I found this an interesting popular intro to the alphabet an entitity with its own history. He deals with Cyrillic briefly.
I am not a:
Poet?
Priest?
Pope?
Philosopher?
Pedant?
Pain in the ass?
I meant “professional,” but actually any of the above work.
If you want to understand a country’s alphabet, “follow the religion”. This will lead you to the answer at least 90% of the time.
Roman rite Catholicism (or protestant) = Latin alphabet
Eastern rite = Greek (or it’s descendants, like Cyrillic)
Moslim = arabic
The classic scenario is Serbia and Coratia. No one would aruge that the people of those two countries do not speak a single language. Serbs, being Eastern Rite folks use a modified Cyrillic alphabet while their Roman Catholic neighbors use the Latin alphabet.
Turkey is an interesting example of a Moslem country which (very intentionally) switched from the Arabic script to the Latin script in order to “modernize” and “westernize” in the early part of the 20th century.
obviously that should’ve been:
Moslem = Arabic
Philologist – duh!
–Cliffy
True enough, but pedantry leads me to note that Xians in the Arabic world use Arabic script ( I note your caveat above).
I believe that the use of the Cyrillic alphabet was also spread for purely political reasons. From this site about the Mongolian script, http://www.mongoliatoday.com/issue/2/old_script.html
With the demise of the Soviet Union, I believe there has been something of a revival in the use of older, non-Cyrillic scripts in these nations as well as increased use of the Roman alphabet in some fields (particularly with computers).
Coll: Although you noted my caveat, what I was getting at was that the script of a country and its language is usually determined by the dominant historicval religion in that country. I would fully expect Arabic speaking Christians (and Jews for that matter) to use the Arabic script in writng the language they speak.
Chuck: You are correct. While historically, it writing usually entered a new country via its religion, in the modern era we have seen this shift to politics. Moldovans were foced to switch to Cyrillic when that region was incorporated into the Russian/Soviet sphere of influence. Turkey is another example (as I noted above) although the influence was internal politics, not external.
I’m also not sure how much this principle applies to the far east. For example, did Japan import Chinese Characters along with Buddhism, or was it at least partially independent of that process?
And clearly China did not adopt Indian script with Buddhism, presumably because it already had a firmly esatblished writing system.
According to
this , the Kazakh language used an Arabic script before shifting to the Latin alphabet, and then the Cyrillic. I believe that the Kazakhs living in Xinjiang still use the older Arabic script.