WRS: *If my people hear America is performing gay marriages, America’s already low reputation will plummet. […]
But, then, trying to explain “same-sex marriage” would take just too much energy. […]
I mean, imagine a South Asian wedding of two people of same sex. Which side will give the jewelry? Which person will wear the dress and jewelry and put mehndi/henna on their hands and feet? Who will follow whom around the fire altar (if they’re Hindu)? Who will be hidden until the other consents to marriage? Which one will act shy and demure? How will they determine whom to stop for money during the various stopping-for-money traditions? *
(snort) Maybe you need to call home a little more often, WRS. I’m an American currently living in India, and I assure you that plenty of Indians are familiar with the concept of homosexuality. Homosexual acts between males are criminalized (the law ignores the possibility of such acts between females), but there is growing and increasingly vocal opposition to this discrimination. I know a few gay Indians, and although most Indian gays are at least partially closeted, there is widespread recognition that homosexuality does exist in India.
Look at the recent Bollywood smash hit Kal Ho Naa Ho, which used a supposed (though actually nonexistent) homosexual relationship between the two male protagonists for comic effect (and also included a sympathetic shot of a kiss between a gay male couple). Other characters in the movie were distressed by this supposed relationship and considered it abnormal and undesirable, but they certainly didn’t need anyone to explain to them what same-sex marriage is! (Even the elderly housekeeper in the movie is capable of identifying gay butt-f***ing when she (thinks she) sees it.) So I really think that many of your South Asian compatriots are quite a bit more sophisticated about homosexuality than you’re giving them credit for, even if most of them still don’t actually accept or approve of it.
And I have not named the South Asian country I am supposedly referring to because as far as values are concerned, there’s little difference among Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, etc.
“Little difference”? No way. There are distinct cultural differences among the various South Asian countries, so I don’t see how you can say that their “values” are basically the same (e.g., mostly-Muslim Pakistan and Bangladesh are much more tolerant of polygamy and divorce, which are accepted Muslim practices, than mostly-Hindu India, since modern mainstream Hinduism disapproves of them). Homosexuality AFAIK isn’t widely accepted in any of the S. Asian countries, but that doesn’t mean that their “values” are generally interchangeable.