Do I recall correctly that Fierra’s house was damaged in the Buncefield blast?
Have you seen this BBC article?
There’s still some way to go to determine the payouts and level of liability.
The company is stating that it could not have predicted the amount of damage - thereby inferring that they had carried out an adequate risk assessment.
Personally I think they are screwed, because if they were not able to envisage the possible worst case scenario, then by default, the risk assessment was not sufficient.
Me, I think they have probably used the worst defence they could have.
Fierra’s house was insignificantly damaged, and has since been sold. Thank you for asking and informing, however.