'Paid for: My Journey Through Prostitution' by Rachel Moran - Some question her veracity

I suppose the question is how can you prove you were a prostitute? I saw a Salon article about this bookand intrigued I looked it up on Amazon. On Amazonthere were a few one star reviews which was odd to me because who could she be offending by exposing the abuses of prostitution.

In looking at these one star reviews they are not actually book reviews as such, but allegations of fabrication and fraud against the author. There is a person (with some supporters) who claims to have been a prostitute who worked for several years at the exact same times and in the same places as Moran specified she did in the book, and says she never saw hide nor hair of anyone like Moran. Which would be odd because Moran claims (in the Salon Article) to have been an extremely active, borderline aggressive, take no shit prostitute who everyone would have been aware of.

The person alleging fraud says it was actually a fairly small group of prostitutes who worked the area and they all knew each other fairly intimately. No one in this group has ever heard of Moran. The person alleging fraud says Moran is fronting for an anti-prostitution group with an agenda and the whole book is fabrication. Basically she claims that Moran’s character is a concocted ghost who was not where she said she was, and was not doing what she claimed she was doing.

How could Moran prove she was there doing what she said?

I have no idea of the truth, but just because the two stories don’t agree, it doesn’t have to be Moran that’s lying. It’s easy to believe the journalism is fake. It “makes sense” that people lie. But why believe prostitutes? It’s not like they are the world’s most honorable profession, after all.

I have no opinion about this topic overall either way. You could however, substitute “journalist” for “prostitute” in your last two sentences and they would be equally as plausible.

True, but it’s more than story details not agreeing perfectly. They say she wasn’t even present period, during the time she was supposed to be a very active prostitute. Plus Moran is representing this as a 100% honest, raw slice of life truth with specific details not some general 'omage to sex worker tribulations. This is supposed to be her true story. And therein lies another point that her detractors claim which is that none of the claims she makes about the gritty details and real world specifics of sex work in that area hold any water. It’s like she never really was a prostitute.

And honestly, re the Salon portion, it “reads” like a grad student’s thesis not a real life hooker’s bio of hard living and life on the street.

Tis true, sadly.

I read an excerpt of the book, and it pinged my “fabricated story” meter. Too much protesting that she was the one special snowflake who’d worked in all different varieties of prostitution in her locality.

Not long ago there was a similar book published (under the name Patricia Perquin) in the Netherlands and it later turned out to be 100% fabricated. As many in the business had been saying.

The municipality of Amsterdam even used its insights to adjust their policy. Amazingly enough, her book still gets cited as proof of what is “going on” in the red light district.

It remains a very polarized subject matter and it seems none of the information that’s out there can be trusted. From both sides of the argument it seems the story they want to tell is more important than the truth.

I don’t think there’s any reason to as that either journalists or sex workers are likely to be less trustworthy than a person from another profession.

I found this website and it kind of summarizes the issues others have with the reliability of her story basically accusing Rachel Moran of blatant literary fraud re the truth of her memoir

I assume she has no arrest record? Is that unlikely? I have no idea how common it is to get picked up by the police in that line of work.

Her accusers claim she has no arrest record whatsoever for the specific time and area she claimed to be providing sex worker services despite claiming to have aggressively worked the entire gamut of prostitution services, including street walking for several years in that location.

More hereabout her being a complete ghost.