[QUOTE=fusoya]
Why do smokers have to work less time per day than non-smokers, and get paid the same amount? Is there some compromise with HR where they’re actually NOT getting favorable treatment which I am being left in the dark about?
[/quote]
Sadly, this is just one of those things that happens. It is changing, slowly, but surely. In many of the places where I have worked where this is the way of things, it was that way because management/owners of the business were also smokers.
[QUOTE=fusoya]
Why SHOULD smokers be allowed to take breaks, sometimes on an hourly basis? Unlike bathroom breaks, which BENEFIT an employee’s health, smoke breaks actually deter from both the workflow and the smoker’s health, and last time I checked, cigarette addiction wasn’t part of the ADA, so why would companies hire/not-fire someone who can’t go 4 hours without a cigarette?
[/quote]
They shouldn’t – no more so than a crackhead should be allowed to go hit a rock or a junkie allowed a needle break. Again, in many situations, you will find that upper management are usually smokers in the types of environment in which this occurs.
[QUOTE=fusoya]
Lastly, would it be unethical if the next time I started a job, I told my boss that I was a smoker, and maybe even bought a pack to keep on my desk and carry outside, and instead just took a fresh air break every 2 hours? Infact, shouldn’t non-smokers have just as much a right to take a couple paid fresh-air 15 minute breaks a day, seeing as smokers have an excuse to do so?
[/quote]
Yes, it would be unethical to pretend to be a smoker for additional breaks. It would not, however, be unethical to occasionally take that 5-10 minute break and if someone asks about it mention that you have noticed smokers taking smoke breaks, but since you are a non-smoker, you needed a fresh air break. If your boss has a problem with that, then you might consider seeking other employment.
As for the secondary part of that – yes, non-smokers should be allowed the same breaks as their stinky co-workers. When I was in management, I allowed smoke and non-smoke breaks. My smokers got smoke breaks, my non-smokers got non-smoke breaks – during which they could go outside, go wander around the building, whatever, just to get a break. I only had one person (a smoker, go figure) tell me that it was not acceptable to do that – so I made it non-smoking period. The only breaks anyone got were scheduled breaks. No smoke breaks, and no non-smoke breaks. It took a week for that asshole to quit. After that, we went back to my policy of everyone being treated equally.
[QUOTE=fusoya]
What is your office’s policy on this?
[/QUOTE]
One of the reasons I love where I work is the smoking policy there. The entire facility – including the parking lot – is a smoke-free environment. This means that if you are caught lighting up on company property – even in your own car in the parking lot – it is a disciplinary situation. When this first went into effect, people tried to circumvent the smoking ban by getting in their cars and driving to the neighboring parking lot during their breaks. A memo went out very quickly letting everyone know that during your unpaid lunch, you can go wherever you want and feel free to smoke a whole pack if you need to, but during your paid 15 minute breaks leaving the facility was not allowed. This policy has been a godsend. No more stinky nasty cigarette butts by the entry, no more walking through nasty stale smoke to get inside, etc.