This isn’t angry or ranty enough for the pit, but over the years I have noticed that in the various work places I’ve been in, some people sneak out every hour or so to take a smoke break. While it only takes them 5 minutes to smoke, you can add another 5-10 minutes in for some of these places just to get up and down the elevators and through security again, resulting in a 15 minute break, which is the same as what some of my lunch breaks are when I don’t want to stick around as long. However, in almost every job I’ve had, we’re required to write down on our timesheets either when we left and returned from our lunch break, or how long it was, and more often than not, this time is deducted from our total pay. However, there is never such a case for smoke breaks.
This raises a couple of questions, one factual, the others opinionated.
Why do smokers have to work less time per day than non-smokers, and get paid the same amount? Is there some compromise with HR where they’re actually NOT getting favorable treatment which I am being left in the dark about?
Why SHOULD smokers be allowed to take breaks, sometimes on an hourly basis? Unlike bathroom breaks, which BENEFIT an employee’s health, smoke breaks actually deter from both the workflow and the smoker’s health, and last time I checked, cigarette addiction wasn’t part of the ADA, so why would companies hire/not-fire someone who can’t go 4 hours without a cigarette?
Lastly, would it be unethical if the next time I started a job, I told my boss that I was a smoker, and maybe even bought a pack to keep on my desk and carry outside, and instead just took a fresh air break every 2 hours? Infact, shouldn’t non-smokers have just as much a right to take a couple paid fresh-air 15 minute breaks a day, seeing as smokers have an excuse to do so?
What is your office’s policy on this?