Pants-wetting airline passengers doing the terrorists' job

Anyway, if we make our flight security decisions based on children’s anxieties, at the least we’ll have to leave the cabin lights on all night to keep the monsters from crawling out of the toilet.

Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Terrorists

[

](http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/nation/15294276.htm)If they don’t check the list until after the plane takes off, isn’t it more of a “fly list” than a “no-fly list”?

CMC fnord!

…and if you’re on the list, they don’t land?

What I didn’t understand was why the complainers weren’t told that they didn’t have to remain on the flight…seems far more logical to me.

I’m just thinking about the chronology of how it would have happened: six passengers refused to board, therefore the flight will not have been pushed back on time. The guys understandably start clock-watching, as anybody would. At the same time, the rumours are starting, at which point half the plane are sneaking glances at them. And, my God, they’re looking at their watches in a suspicious way!

Yikes, it was a 3am departure. No wonder the kids were crying.

They were screaming and causing havoc, the Asian guys were sat quietly waiting to fly home. Easier to get the oh-so-helpful Spanish police to ‘investigate’ the two ‘suspicious’ characters than pacify a bunch of hysterical Mancs.

I live in Spain’s “terrorist country” and I don’t think differently. Before they came up with the notion of “kale borroka” and some genius of a judge decreed that it’s “not terrorist activity”, one of the steps in the training of ETA’s puppies was to blow up the big electric station in my home town. The Guardia Civil has taken more than one to the hospital after he managed to do more damage to himself than to the transformer. I know people who have survived attacks from ETA, been to funerals of people who were killed by ETA; at age 8, I was in ETA’s death list and so were all my cousins, uncles and great-uncles, my 2yo bro and my 2mo bro (yeah, apparently ETA doesn’t like our lastname).

I’ve been called a murderer just for being from my homeland; I’ve been called a traitor to my foreparents for being from my homeland and not a separatist (FFS, one of my foreparents signed the unification treaty!)

And I’m not dumb enough to “complain about flying with a bearded muslim”. I’ve got better things to do with my life than shit my pants, thanks.

The two men involved have now given a newspaper interview :- Daily Mirror As you can see they were speaking Urdu and not Arabic, they were wearing windcheaters and not a heavy coat, and they must be Muslim fundamentalists because they had been on a boozy holiday. :slight_smile:

Actually, they were probably the only people on the plane dressed in suitable clothing for an arrival at sunny Manchester in the dead of night.

Now I think about it, I’ve caught a flight with a ludicrous amount of clothing (bulky overcoat et al) given the mild weather at Stansted. But this was because I’d checked the forecast in Glasgow, and didn’t fancy waiting for a train at Prestwick in sub-zero temperatures in just a shirt should Ryanair decided to lose my bags.

From the article linked by Rayne Man:

Now I know that’s just a snippet but I wish she’d been a bit more apologetic. The undertone I get from that is “Well it’s OK, 'cos we all agreed they looked a bit dodgy. Better safe than sorry, init.”

Bollocks. If there’s a slippery slope anywhere it’s this mob mentality and the condoning (or not condemning) of it. How long until a mob or a couple of have-a-gos tackles a ‘dodgy’ character?

Kudos to the boys for taking it so well and being level headed in that article. And for not threatening to sue everyone in sight.

Someone coming back from Spain a bit worst for wear? A person on a plane traveling between countries not speaking English? Say it aint so.

The two say they weren’t wearing heavy clothes

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17607948%26method=full%26siteid=94762%26headline=exclusive--malaga-jet-mutiny-pair-s-shock-at-plane-ejection-name_page.html

They were coming home from a holiday like a lot of Brits.

The people on the plane were moronic fucking gobshites. The kind of people who buy the same kinda of bollocks you seem to.

Yes there are dangers in this world but there has been for a long time. Governments are ramping up the fear and the press are helping.

There was no danger on the plane. Only morons.

If you read this BBC article you will see that the woman sitting next to the two was supposed to have overheard them saying “we have only 30 minutes to live”. But according to the Mirror article they were speaking Urdu and that woman couldn’t understand what they were saying. So a false story gets the boys thrown off the plane.

Actually, the simple solution is to arm all the passengers as they get on the plane and then retrieve the weapons as they disembark.

Arm them with what? Guns that will shoot holes in the plane’s fuselage? If this had been the case on the Malaga to Manchester flight I wonder how long before one of the ignorant chavs had opened fire?

Heh. That’s funny. I bet no one would ever take a crap on a dessert cart again.

Tasers. :slight_smile:

Nah, the Manc gobshites would just constantly tase each other for the craic and then sure the airline.

Actually, that’s not a bad idea …

“Oh my God they’re coming right at us!” BLAM BLAM BLAM…

You wouldn’t need an in-flight movie. And once you’re in the air, passengers could bet on who’ll be left standing when the plane lands.