Then make it funny, Adam Sandler.
Ohhhhhh, burn!
That’s hate speech.
By Googling ‘myth of one out of four women are raped’ I found quite a few links disproving this lie.
Here’s one , and it cites sources:
Why do you hate women?
When I googled “why the fuck does dale still think that article said 1 in 4 women are raped,” I got a website that called me stupid for wasting my time.
It also told me to tell you to get some therapy.
Yeah, because THAT’S a really reliable source. :rolleyes:
(For godsakes, there’s a link on that page for Angry White Dude. Are you fucking kidding me?)
I think dalej42’s mother must’ve been drinking corn liquor while she was pregnant.
Here’s two more good articles calling the 1 in 4 myth into question:
The first link is an opinion piece, you blithering idiot.
The second link refers to college age sexual assault, you useless fuckstick.
And what does the point you are ineffectively trying to make (the rate of sexual assault) have to do with your OP premise that the alleged victim is likely lying because - Patrick Kane, you used tampon of a human being?
Here is an article from SI which puts Croce’s remarks in perspective. There is a good chance he is really talking out of his ass.
That’s pretty much his thing. In a town where there are a million neighborhood bars and family-friendly bar and grills, Sky Bar (the bar this guy owns and where Patrick Kane was that night) is one of very few real nightclubs, like what would pass for a nightclub in a more cosmopolitan place. I think Croce is doing damage control so that his bar doesn’t come across as a date rape bar – it already has a bit of a reputation as a sleezy hook-up place – and is hedging his bets that Kane gets off the hook and continues to patronize Sky Bar in the future (and I feel as more information has been coming out, that particular bet is looking dumber and dumber).
Regardless of Croce’s motives, his comments didn’t have any business being included in the local news coverage of the rape allegations.
I didn’t ask for cites on the 1 in 4 statistic. :smack: What I asked was how is your comment about it, which you proved with a link to the he-man-woman-haters-club, relevant to this case and how does it make this not a real rape case?
I asked him for the cites, because I wanted to know where the fuck he got his information.
Looks like a gold digger to me:
http://www.niagarafallsreporter.com/Stories/2015/AUG11/kane.html
Her name needs to be released,.
Why? So you and others can go and harass her? (Which is what usually happens when someone makes an accusation of rape. Remember that young teenager who was gang-raped while passed out at a party?)
You seem to have extremely poor reading comprehension skills. You also seem to have difficulty distinguishing the difference between fact and innuendo. this “article” reads like a very dumb vanity piece written by Kanes’ even dumber brother or something. Despite the “article” being a string of irrelevant data (she was a former cheerleader at UB? And an aspiring model? Obviously a liar!), nothing in it contradicts her claims; rather, her claims are backed up by everything in it. Maybe you only read the headline? Understandable; there *are *a few big words in the article.
Here’s the level of “reporting” in the article, for anyone with better reading comprehension skillz than the OP:
O, the injustice!
This has any relevance because…? What her “friends” are saying is nothing more than innuendo. Who cares what her friends say? And ‘not wanting this to go to trial’ doesn’t mean what you think it does. You realize that few plaintiffs want to have to testify in open court in sexual assault trials, due to having already been traumatized and not wanting to relive it in front of a roomful of strangers nor suffer through the dehumanizing cross-examination where the plaintiff is accused of asking for it, deserving it, or making it all up?
[Blueing mine] That, or she was advised by someone not brain-dead.
I can’t post any more; my brain already hurts from having had to read this article.
I suggest she was advised by someone who knows how to falsify rape claims. No one is doubting that sex occurred so why need a ‘rape kit?’
Aspiring actress and model sounds like an unemployed college dropout using her looks to get what she wants.
If she’s truly looking for justice and not 1-2 million dollars, I think she’d be happy to go to trial.
Not once, ever.
What’s a rape kit, dale? What is it for? Why do they administer them? What would you say if she had not submitted to one?
I just…I cannot even with the stupidity here.
You disgusting son of a bitch.
Likewise, if Kane’s innocent, why would he be looking to buy her off, instead of going to trial?