Paul McCartneys' hair piece

^^^I don’t know, my family has a lot of “in-naming.” One cousin married a man with the same last name. Her maiden and married name are the same.

Coincidences abound in a family, especially in the southern U. S., or a closely-knit industrial town like Liverpool in the 40s/50s/60s, probably.

Sir Rhosis

Which is still remarkable, considering he died 35 years ago. :smiley:

I don’t think Sir Paul is aging all that gracefully. I actually thought that pre-cancerous George was aging the best out of the remaining three.

I think Paul would look much better with a different haircut. It’s way too short around the ears. He either needs to let it all grow out a bit or wear the whole thing very short. I also think he’d look better if he went stopped putting shoe polish in his hair and allowed it to go back to grey.

Not that closely knit; one of McCartney’s cousins married one of mine from Accrington way a few years back.

Blah. He must wear a ton of make-up during interviews.

Some people just get away with it. My father is 71. Still has all his hair, although it’s all white now, and he’s about the same size he’s always been (which is quite thin). He probably looks better than he really is, though – a lifetime of drinking and smoking has to have done some damage.

Some people just get away with that too.

Does JPM still smoke? I know he used to always have a grit in his hand during every interview,.