Paul Ryan not running for re-election

The Onion: Entitled Deadbeat Finally Breaks Out Of 20-Year Cycle Of Government Dependency

This all seems to suggest that Ryan is merely a bystander in American politics and public opinion.

He’s not. He was and still is an extremely major player, and could have been very influential, rhetorically speaking. If he had very openly, harshly, and consistently criticized Trump for various problematic, incompetent, and disgusting rhetoric and actions, that might have helped other Republicans in office find their courage to do so as well. He would have gotten a ton of pushback, of course, but that doesn’t absolve for failing to do the right thing.

Yeah, my cheap shot at him aside, stepping stepping down and getting far from the maddening crowd is actually a good movie for Ryan, who has never been more than a reluctant Trump supporter and whose Randite ambitions are never going to be achieve in this congress despite Republican control of all three branches. Being Speaker of the House is a challenging job at the best of times and with interparty divisiveness spurred on by an in-name-only chief executive it is an entirely pointless job that was so stressful it apparently turned previous Speaker John Boehner into a dirty hippie.

And yes, public memory is short enough that Ryan can make a run for office in 2020 or 2022 and dismiss all criticisms as pertaining only to the “Old Paul Ryan” who has since remade himself. Although my initial thought was taking a run at President in 2020, I suspect there is going to be a massive scrum, particularly if Trump is not running for one reason or another, and it would make more sense to challenge for the Senate seat in a state that leans conservative (even if Wisconsinites seem to be getting their fill of Scott Walker) and promose reform from within, and then use that as a lever into a Presidential run in 2024.

Or Ryan could just quit politics and go to work for some lobbying firm or conservative thinktank which would pay handsomely to have a former Speaker of the House on its brochure. But I think he actually enjoys politics, and he’s you, photogenic, and well-spoken enough to make a viable presidential candidate despite his reprehensible philosophy, and I’d be surprised if he isn’t positioning for a run at the title.

Stranger

He wasn’t a bystander but he didn’t have a lot of power under the circumstances. If he had “openly, harshly, and consistently criticized Trump for various problematic, incompetent, and disgusting rhetoric and actions” he would have just been removed from office, that’s all.

[In addition, Trump has continued to disintegrate as time went on. But earlier on, there was more hope that he would normal out as he learned the ropes and political realities - at that time, openly, harshly and consistently criticizing Trump might have been judged to be counterproductive in this regard. But my primary point is as above.]

Fine, we get it. Can we drop it now, this has fuck-all to do with Paul Ryan’s retirement. You can even respond with “OK” just so you can have the last word.

One of the only amusing things I ever heard Steve Bannon say was (paraphrasing) “Paul Ryan came from a test tube at the Heritage Foundation.” That would probably be a good place for him to land. According to Wiki, Ryan has a BA but not a law degree, so he’s not going to go into a legal practice. He could always hit the speaker circuit, getting thousands of dollars a night telling conservatives how repressed they are and complaining about liberal colleges. That never gets old.

When danger reared/it’s ugly head
He bravely turned/his tail and fled.
Yes, Brave Sir Ryan/turned about
And gallently/he chicked out.
Bravely taking/to his feet,
He beat a very/brave retreat.
Bravest of the brave/Sir Ryan!

Stranger

It wouldn’t have been that simple. Further, you shouldn’t be that confident that you can predict how things would unfold after an unusual political event (a House Speaker harshly criticizing his own party’s nominee/president), IMO. It could have motivated other Republicans to join him, or even remove him as the nominee. It was the right thing to do, and he chose the wrong thing, even though the risk was high. He shouldn’t get a pass for doing the wrong thing. Doing the right thing could have lessened the damage to the country.

This hope was not reasonable or rational. Even if it wasn’t clear to Ryan at the beginning, it should be now, that Trump is doing terrible damage to the country (and his party, for that matter), and yet he still doesn’t criticize him.

He chose wrong at the beginning, and he’s continued to choose wrongly. He had a great moral responsibility, and failed utterly, over and over again.

Well, sometimes that’s the price of acting with integrity, and in this case, the price for him personally would have been fairly minimal. He and his family will be, and would have been, well off now and in the future, regardless of which course he chose.

I hope that after he retires from Congress, he and his family can enjoy a nice vacation. In Wales, maybe.

Yes, but how does that help the poor by eliminating any social safety net and then insisting that poverty is a moral failing? Ryan is a true worshiper as the alter of Ayn Rand, and collecting speaking fees isn’t going to advance that sophomoric philosophy or preventing the impoverished from using their massive political influence and lobbying presence from taking trillions of dollars from the public purs…oh, sorry, that’s the financial industry. Never mind.

As Ryan’s Uncle Benji once told him, “With great moral flexibility comes great responsibily to weasel out of consequences.” He’s a superhero whose power is utter spinelessness.

Stranger

Hey, I take offense at that!

You think that criticizing Trump is grounds for impeaching a member of Congress?

Or maybe you just meant that he’d be removed from the Speakership, but remember that the reason he got that job to begin with was because nobody else wanted it.

Apparently, there’s a faction of the House GOP that wants Ryan gone before the midterms. Interestingly, they don’t include the Freedom Caucus. Freedom Caucus wants more time to woo members away from McCarthy, and an immediate resignation would hurt the chances of that happening. They’re rooting for the “longest speakership race in history.”

Waiting until the next Congress to fight over the Minority Leader post is actually the smart move for the Freedumb Caucus – that way, Ryan still gets much of the blame for the fiasco, and the Republicans who survive the coming Blue Tsunami will be disproportionately the really cray-cray ones from districts ruby-red enough to weather the storm.

Of course, actually following that script requires them to put sound tactical planning ahead of personal ambition…

Plus, it’s kinda adorable that they think that if Ryan serves until the end of his term, that it’ll still be a “speakership race” the GOP’s engaged in.

What exactly is the base of support for the two leading contenders? Politically there doesn’t look like there’s much difference between Scalise and McCarthy but I haven’t really followed them.

I gather that McCarthy is the Freedumb Caucus favorite while Scalise has more traction with the rest of the party.

What *is *the rest of the party anymore?

According to the linked story -
*“This is a job that does not last forever,” Ryan said at a news conference in Washington Wednesday morning, saying his desire to spend more time with his wife and three teenage kids was the main factor in his decision, and denying that his party’s cloudy election outlook played a role.

“If I’m here for one more term, my kids will only have known me as a weekend dad. I just can’t let that happen,” he said.

Rumors of Ryan’s departure had abounded in recent months, fueled by private conversations about his future, the short shelf life of a speaker’s tenure, his reluctance to become speaker in the first place, his differences with Trump, the possibility of a Democratic wave this fall and the absence of a formal re-election announcement.*

The lame stream media has been discussing Ryan’s not running for reelection, or for another term as Speaker, for many, many months. Now they “appear” shocked at this “sudden” announcement.

If they got it right, how is that “lame”? The truly lame media is the faction that didn’t discuss it, hmm?

On the contrary. McCarthy is something of a moderate (relatively speaking, of course), which is what torpedoed his chances at speaker when Boehner resigned; the Freedom Caucus blocked him. Paul Ryan was the compromise. Incidentally, McCarthy’s also fairly close with Trump.

I don’t think the FC has a clear favorite right now, other than probably one of their own, or at least a very right-wing member of Congress. That’s why they don’t like the idea of Ryan resigning before his term ends; having him serve it out gives them time to find someone to throw their weight behind besides McCarthy, the presumed front-runner for speaker/minority leader.