So, when do you figure Daniel Radcliffe lost his virginity? Somewhere around 12? The day he got his first bona fide boner? That is one young man who doesn’t have to work very hard for the pootie. (I think the age of consent is 14 in Canada, just for the record.)
There are a lot of crap opinions and information about youthful sexuality, in my opinion. Heck, let’s just make that sexuality, period, and be done with it.
Yeah, this kinda crap gets on my nerves too. I read a review of Notes on a Scandal in my local paper yesterday. Cate Blanchett gets it on with a 15 year old student who persued her despite her initial rejection, and lies about his family life to engender sympathy, but they refered to it as pedophilia, pisses me right off.
You know dudes, I saw some of the porno films of Traci Lords before they banned them. She was hot, and if that makes me a pervert, let me get in that line over there with the other 99% of red-blooded hetero males.
Once you paint with a brush so damn wide it includes almost everyone, then the name you’re calling becomes meaningless.
Although I can’t say a nekkid Harry Potter does much for me, if he turns you on, then fine by me.
Now, sure, if you do anything about that, it could be illegal depending on what juristiction and year it is. But it wasn’t so long ago that anyone having gay sex with anyone was a dangerous criminal pervert and men having sex with 14yo was normal. :rolleyes:
The age of consent for horses in most states is 3, so you should be okay.
Not, of course, that there’s anything wrong with that!
Just out of curiosity, do you have a cite for this?
From what I’ve always read, this murder has never been solved, and since they only recovered the son’s severed head, there was no evidence of sexual assault found.
The contention that he was abducted and killed by a pedophile was propogated by Mr. Walsh himself for years, but I think he eventually quit claiming that since there has never been any evidence or proof of it.
Abducted and killed, no doubt. By a pedophile? No evidence. If such people are rightly deserving of our condemnation, we shouldn’t have to make up reasons for it. Accusing someone of this crime with no proof or evidence is nothing but hatemongering.
I could swear Cecil did a column on this, but I can’t find it anymore.
That pretty much sums up my attitude too. He’s a beautiful specimen of humanity and i can see that he’s hot. I can also see that other teen celebrities are hot, both boys and girl. None of that means i want to have any sexual involvement with them. I’m puzzled that people don’t get this.
Rubbish!
You’d drop your panties in a minute if he asked, we all know that.
Sluts the lot of you.
I’m shocked and stunned. I really am. Shocked and stunned.
No, I wouldn’t. He’s too young for me and I’m happily married. I can still admire what a fine young man he’s turning into there.
Nice whoosh, there rayh. Get your mind out of the gutter. 
I’m going on Walsh’s own words and the death row confessions of Ottis Toole. You’re quite right that nobody was ever convicted of Adam’s murder, but Walsh very clearly he was the victim of a pedophile, it most definitely seems a reasonable theory, and as a man who has dedicated his life ever since to hunting for missing children and the accumulation of data on pedophiles one would think Walsh would certainly know what a pedophile is and that a man who lusts after 17 year old interns is not one (at least not necessarily).
Pedophilia may have been among Toole’s array of evils, but even if so, he wasn’t predominantly a pedophile who happened to kill, but a killer who happened to
be a pedophile.
You know what? If Daniel Radcliffe showed up on my doorstep and offered himself up, I’d nail him and I’m not the least bit apologetic about it. Fuck all this “oh yes, I can certainly admire him as if he were a precious watercolor lily” bullshit. I’m in my late 30s and if saying I’d fuck a hot willing 17 year-old makes me a pervert in someone’s eyes then that’s their damage, not mine.
Lately (as in the past few days) there’s been some suggestion that Jeffrey Dahmer might have been responsible for Adam Walsh’s death.
[nanny ogg]
The wizard’s staff has a knob on the end, knob on the end, knob on the end . . .
[/no]
Thank you, Otto, I totally agree with youl whomever of you may vilify me for my opinion, go ahead.
I remember when I saw that bathub scene (in whichever HP movie it was), my first thought was of hotness (has been for a while).
My second thought was that this scene was not staged with Harry, wet and slick and glistenting, in a bathtub for no reason. Now, the film makers were probably going for a certain young and female crowd with that choice, but if you create hotness, don’t be surpised and shocked when it effect (and effectiveness) spills over.
And, further, there have been several male and female persons younger than Daniel Radcliffe whom I’ve looked at and admired and had to remark to myself, “He/she is certainly going to be a heartbreaker someday.” Who hasn’t?
Thank you, Otto, I totally agree with you; whomever of you may vilify me for my opinion, go ahead.
I remember when I saw that bathub scene (in whichever HP movie it was), my first thought was of hotness (has been for a while).
My second thought was that this scene was not staged with Harry, wet and slick and glistenting, in a bathtub for no reason. Now, the film makers were probably going for a certain young and female crowd with that choice, but if you create hotness, don’t be surpised and shocked when it effect (and effectiveness) spills over.
And, further, there have been several male and female persons younger than Daniel Radcliffe whom I’ve looked at and admired and had to remark to myself, “He/she is certainly going to be a heartbreaker someday.” Who hasn’t?
And, further, there have been several male and female persons younger than Daniel Radcliffe whom I’ve looked at and admired and had to remark to myself, “He/she is certainly going to be a heartbreaker someday.” Who hasn’t?
And, further, there have been several male and female persons younger than Daniel Radcliffe whom I’ve looked at and admired and had to remark to myself, “He/she is certainly going to be a heartbreaker someday.” Who hasn’t?
Thank you, Otto, I totally agree with you; whomever of you may vilify me for my opinion, go ahead.
I remember when I saw that bathub scene (in whichever HP movie it was), my first thought was of hotness (has been for a while).
My second thought was that this scene was not staged with Harry, wet and slick and glistenting, in a bathtub for no reason. Now, the film makers were probably going for a certain young and female crowd with that choice, but if you create hotness, don’t be surpised and shocked when it effect (and effectiveness) spills over.
And, further, there have been several male and female persons younger than Daniel Radcliffe whom I’ve looked at and admired and had to remark to myself, “He/she is certainly going to be a heartbreaker someday.” Who hasn’t?
And, further, there have been several female persons younger than Daniel Radcliffe whom I’ve looked at and admired and had to remark to myself, “She is certainly going to be a heartbreaker someday.” Who hasn’t?
And, further, there have been several female persons younger than Daniel Radcliffe whom I’ve looked at and admired and had to remark to myself, “She is certainly going to be a heartbreaker someday.” Who hasn’t?
And, further, there have been several female persons younger than Daniel Radcliffe whom I’ve looked at and admired and had to remark to myself, “She is certainly going to be a heartbreaker someday.” Who hasn’t?
And I have no idea what’s going on with Post #38.
And, further…