I’m not sure that this quote is being taken in context. If it is (and if I had to bet, I’d bet that it is), then yeah, hypocrisy is a very fair charge against her. But by searching PETA’s website for “insulin,” I came across this article by her.
In it, she doesn’t advocate that diabetics give up insulin; instead, she advocates that they use other measures to minimize the amount of insulin that they take:
Her science may be questionable, but it appears here that she’s calling for diabetics to take the least-harmful path to animals that still keeps the diabetic healthy, not calling for them to die rather than take animal-derived insulin. That seems to me to be a consistent position.
It doesn’t seem to jibe with the earlier quote, though. If the earlier quote had left off the last sentence–“I need my life to fight for the rights of animals”–it would be innocuous. It’s the last sentence that really grates, with its not-so-subtle implication that those who don’t fight for the rights of animals don’t need their lives as much.
Daniel