You sound about 12 years old when you post crap like that. Kudos if you are less than 12.
Sure. The conditions at Chambers Bay were about as close to St. Andrews as you can get in a US golf course. He would have been the favorite even if Rory were healthy.
No, he didn’t. The PGA was the third major of 1953, so Hogan won the first, second, and fourth majors of that year. Tiger is the only player to have won three (let alone four) consecutive professional majors since the 1882 Open Championship, when there were 40 players in the field (all from England or Scotland), first prize was 12 pounds, and the low round of the week was 83. Sounds almost as tough as the Open that Gary Player won in 1959, with zero US pros in the field.
But since you bring up Hogan — after Hogan’s brilliant 1953 season, both Gene Sarazen and Byron Nelson proclaimed Hogan as the greatest player of all time. Hogan’s 1953 Open win was his 9th and last major win, even retroactively calling the Masters a major – and even calling the Open a major, since it had fallen into such disregard after WW II that the PGA didn’t even bother to schedule around it. Hogan was one of only four Americans in the field, including an amateur and an obscure club pro. Like all post-war Open Championships before the mid-70’s or later, it had a weaker field than most regular PGA events of the time, let alone today.
Walter Hagen hit his prime before the PGA Championship was founded, and over 20 years before the Masters was founded, so he had only two majors a year to play, the US and British Opens. He had to take a month-long round trip to play the Open, and even so it was cancelled for five years during his prime (and for two years, he had no majors to play at all) due to WW I, so he only played it 10 times in his life. And when the PGA Championship was founded, it was match play, which meant one bad day and you were out, or even one great day and you were out, if your opponent happened to play better that day.
In spite of all that, he won 11 professional majors, even if you don’t count his five Western Opens, which were considered majors at the time. Yet Hogan was widely considered the greatest player ever, before Jack. Including, by the way, by Jack himself. And if it wasn’t Hogan, it was Jones, who had won four consecutive majors, even though two of them had zero pros and no more than half a dozen world class golfers in the field. And if it wasn’t Hogan or Jones, it was Nelson, or maybe Snead. What all of the above have in common is that none of them had as many pro major wins as Walter Hagen.
So all the BS about 18>14 seems to be a matter of convenience for Jack fans. Nelson, Sarazen, and even Nicklaus clearly thought that three or four majors in a row were a lot better than more majors won over a long period.
But then, they knew a lot about the game.