Phelps spreads Hate; but it ain't towards Homos

[Marley23]

@Homebrew

Pot. Kettle. Assholes.

@tdn

Remind me not to let you make me a cup of tea.

Eh. I’m intrigued by the idea of pouring a kettle or boiling water - or better yet, gallons of boiling oil - into Fred Phelps’s asshole.

[Wolfian]

@Miller

So… he thinks Phelps is a fruit?

I wanted to make the Clue reference. : Pouts :

Anne Neville, I’ll totally be writing that down and using it. Good stuff.

[jayjay]

@tdn

What’s the gayest plant? I’m thinking willow. 'Cause they swish.

As Buffy fans will tell you, Willow is indeed very gay…

[Homebrew]

@Loopydude

Fred violates just about any common-sense standard of human conduct, be it theistic or no. He’s a monster who happens to fixate on a particular religious tradition to give his malignancy some structure and ostensible significance. He’s not worth a critique by normal standards of decency or ethical code. Abnormal psychology is the only real yardstick to measure him by.

Yeah. But I started this thread to bitch about LaBarbera, not Fred. LaBarbera is the one ignoring the damage of the hateful message and instead whining that it casts him in a bad light. The peas may not be in the same pod, but they’re on the same stalk.

[Bosda_Di_Chi_of_Tricor]

@tdn

Remind me not to let you make me a cup of tea.

BRAVO!!

[Anne_Neville]

@askeptic

I pretty much figure if god wants it done the bastard can damn well do it himself. Therefore everything ever done in gods name (which is a truck load of really stupid shit) has been done in vain.

I of course have no way of knowing, but I believe that God cares more about actually harmful things done in His name than merely unnecessary things done in His name. The point is, you shouldn’t do things in God’s name unless you’re willing to stake your soul on being right about them being beneficial rather than harmful…

@Homebrew

But I started this thread to bitch about LaBarbera, not Fred. LaBarbera is the one ignoring the damage of the hateful message and instead whining that it casts him in a bad light.

I’m saying that part (by no means all) of the damage that Phelps does is that he discredits God and all religion when he does what he does.

[Baldwin]

Breaks my heart when there’s this kind of discord within the hate-based community. Why can’t they see that the hatred they have in common is more important than the hatred they disagree about?

[askeptic]

@Anne Neville

I The point is, you shouldn’t do things in God’s name unless you’re willing to stake your soul on being right about them being beneficial rather than harmful…

The problem with that is people like phelps would not hesitate in staking his soul on the rightness of their actions. That is the whole foundational problem with religion. Followers of most religions believe that they know what some wierd omnipotent E.T. thinks is right despite the fact that even if you believe their own fairytales (Tora, Talmud, Bible, etc.) the fucker hasn’t had much to say in a couple of thousand years. Fuck the last time he got really involved on earth he killed everybody except some 900 year old drunk and his family…

Personally I have no I dea if some godlike being exists, but I promise if I ever run in to him I will let him/her/it know that I think he/she/it is a complete and total asshole. I mean how can anyone respect an absentee slumlord?

[askeptic]

This thread is sort of cathartic.

It reminds of the joke:

Wife: Do these pants make my ass look fat?

Husband: No. Your ass makes your ass look fat.

What I mean is that Phelps does not make religion look bad, religion does that all on its own.

I am not suggesting that there are not many many good people who follow various religions, but they are really outnumbered.

[Anne_Neville]

@askeptic

The problem with that is people like phelps would not hesitate in staking his soul on the rightness of their actions.

Of course. But if you’re a normal person who is trying to do the right thing, you probably would.