Fair enough, and internally consistent, thank you. (Not that you care what I think, I’m sure, but you don’t hear enough on this board about when you’re right and reasonable, so I thought I’d let you know.)
For me, it’s more about informed consent to a surgical procedure with very real risks - and especially greater risks than average for this woman. She was able, apparently, to articulate the possible or even probable outcome to her decision to refuse consent, and that’s enough for me to determine she’s of sound mind and decision making capability. The only other people affected aren’t morally or legally people yet, so I don’t give them the same weight I do her. And very most especially, I’m appalled and outraged - not as a doctor, not as an almost-RN, but as a woman and human being - that this was all done clandestinely, without giving her the opportunity to seek a second opinion or appear before a judge herself to argue her own case. I’d like to think it wouldn’t happen that way now, nearly 30 years later, but I’m really not that confident about it.
It makes me think of a lecture I heard from a medical ethicist (hospitalist and doctor) who assured us that Jehovah’s Witnesses WANT to be forced to take blood or give it to their children. That they won’t be held religiously or morally responsible for it if they refuse it and a judge orders it and they get it anyway, so when they refuse, they’re not really refusing, but asking their doctor to go get a court order so they’re not culpable. I really don’t know which I find more offensive: that some JW’s may indeed think that way and are playing a nudge-nudge-wink-wink game when they’re refusing, or that doctors and ethicists *think *that’s what’s going on in some sort of paternalistic, “of course they can’t REALLY think for themselves so they want us to do it for them” attitude.
It’s absolutely true that a layperson doesn’t have the knowledge of medicine that a doctor does. Ignoring doctor’s medical opinions entirely is not the way to go, sure. But it’s also true that a doctor doesn’t have the knowledge of each person’s life, values and relationships that the person has. Surely completely ignoring the patient - not even letting her speak for herself to a judge - isn’t the way to go, either.
And…as the thread has moved on as I’ve been typing…SERIOUSLY? You’d rather have a dermatologist 30 years out of medical school deliver your baby than a CNM, if those were your only options? Okay, now you’re back into crazyland… You have absolutely zero idea how modern medicine works. Nurses, even those who aren’t CNMs, are not doctor’s helpers. We haven’t been for more than 100 years now. We’re competent medical professionals in our own right, and in the case of a CNM, that includes delivering all care during pregnancy, labor and delivery in all but a small percentage of pregnancies. Are there some things outside the expertise of a CNM? Yes, and doing the c-section procedure is one of them. But it would also be outside the expertise of the vast majority of doctors, too!