Picking up trash while black, 5 officers respond.

I’m upset and deeply disturbed by the police’s over reaction and poor judgement. It’s shocking that they brought in 8 officers because a guy was calmly holding a trash grabber stick.

I prefer to discuss the incident calmly and thoughtfully. A little ironic humor helps too.

I burned out ranting and raving awhile ago. All that does is makes me feel ill and reach for the Mylanta afterward. There’s too many bad things happening in the world today to expend that much energy & venom on rants. My own emotional & physical health is more important.

I’m so relieved.

If anyone is interested, this little local story is also news in the UK now:

And I would guess, if it’s news in the UK then it’s probably news across the rest of Europe too, and…

Whether this actually does any good or not is a different question.

j

I’m not blaming anyone. It’s the way things are. The guy is lucky he wasn’t gunned down. You being “tired of the excuse” doesn’t change reality.

There is an internal police investigation. The widespread news coverage should add pressure and get the people responsible reprimanded or terminated.

I can’t read you here. I suspect some sarcasm but I can’t decide where it ends and a sincere statement starts. As far as community relations goes, it does matter. Nobody I know would call the cops if there was trouble, because they never NEVER improve a situation.

You should stop lying to them. Innocent people get arrested and convicted all the time. They also get shot.

This is why police need to be disarmed.

That is the question.

I saw the video and he looks EXACTLY like a man picking up garbage.

Why is it that the responding office did not simply walk up to the man and engage in conversation? Seriously, I am asking.

Why can’t he say ‘Excuse me Sir. Don’t mean to bother you, but we received this call. Can I ask you a couple of questions?’

I cannot hear any audio, but I doubt he said anything like that. I imagine it was more like ‘DROP THE WEAPON!!’

When cops show up jumpy, it makes other people jumpy.

While you are certainly correct in that innocent people get arrested, convicted, and, sometimes, shot, by complying with a police officers demands you increase the odds of a less than disastrous outcome by doing your best to comply.

My big complaint is that it appears that this officer was just following his training. If the officers are trained to draw their weapon first, start shouting demands second, and treat any reaction the object of their ranting* makes as a threatening reaction, we are going to have this result.

*ranting. If an ordinary person was to make such demands by shouting threats, such person would be considered unstable. So, to many people who these officers interact with in this manner, these people are finding themselves in a situation where a crazy person with a gun is screaming unintelligible commands at them. IMO, this is something an officer should be specifically trained NOT to do, not trained that it is what they should do.

where in the video are they aiming guns at him?

They were responding to a call. They can’t just ignore it. It has to be investigated. All this guy had to do was show them some ID and they’d be on their way. But no, he had to throw a tantrum.

A rational person would see how it looks to police. They’re responding to a call and are confronted by 2 highly agitated people.

And he had a tool for dealing with garbage. No wonder the cop felt threatened.

Why do they need to aim guns anywhere? Isn’t possible for a police officer in America to address a situation without needing his or her hand on a gun?

If I were doing yardwork and the police showed up to question me, I would be highly agitated. Of course, I’m white, so no one has ever called the cops on me, even when I’m picking up litter and muttering to myself; if they did, the police would probably approach me more respectfully, and be readier to accept my word.

And, in point of fact, he DOESN’T have to show them ID. Where in US or Colorado or Boulder law does it require that you show papers in order to be allowed to remain in your home? Nowhere, that’s where.

I understand that the police have to respond to calls, and always need to be prepared for the worst-case scenario, but I don’t really see any rational person defending the police here.

It’s not that police community relations are not important, but to make that the takeaway from this incident is to hugely trivialize what was going on. There are some excellent comments in this thread, but the ones I quoted are not among them.

Can we establish some facts first, please?

“3 or maybe 4 cops aiming guns?”
No, one cop has a gun out of its holster and zero cops are aiming guns.

“All this guy had to do was show them some ID”
He did show them ID.

“It can’t be that hard to see trash being picked up vs breaking into a house.”
They were called for suspected trespassing, not B&E.

“Stupid situation that got out of control, certainly”
No, not certainly. At no point is the situation out of control. The cops are in control of themselves. The man is in control of himself. The fact that they’re yelling at each other doesn’t mean anything is out of control.

“I cannot hear any audio”
Let me help you out. The officer says “drop your weapon” and the guy says “I don’t have a weapon! This is a bucket!” which is definitely the funniest line from the whole thing. He says “I live here” and “I’m picking up trash.”
When the officers outflank the man, the original one says “Focus on me” and “Calm down” and “We just want to talk to you.” The man says “I’m a resident of this fucking property. I’m picking up trash from my fucking dorm. I go to school here.” The officer says “Sit down” and he replies “I feel threatened. I will not sit down. I refuse to sit down.” The man tells the officers that the first cop had his gun, and the cop says something disputing that, so the man says “Really? We have it all on camera. So how do you feel about that?”
Eventually the cops say that the man was obviously profiled and they leave.

If I’m wrong, tell me where I’m wrong.

Honestly, this is how these sorts of interactions should turn out. Nobody gets hurt, everyone acts rationally, yells at the other person to calm down, eventually they all do calm down, and everyone goes home.

You want the cops to not show up in the first place? Then blame the person who called them.

So how would you respond to this poster who is defending the police here?:

I’m not sure how you read that as defending the police in this case. I understand their job description, but not how they executed it in this example.

As to what I would suggest they do differently:

  1. Fewer officers
  2. Less yelling. Really, zero yelling on the part of law enforcement. In the cut of the video I saw the officer was fairly restrained in terms of raising his voice, but in my opinion (I’m not a trained LEO) his requests were unreasonable, and his tone was unnecessary. I also think that true requests rather than commands (“would you do me a favour and set down your tools”) would have gone down better.

Given the number of black men who have been shot dead on very flimsy pretexts, I think the young man in the film was very brave (and very foolish) for standing up for himself here. I’m glad it ended as well as it did.

How is “suspected trespassing” grounds for any police response at all, if the call doesn’t come from the landowner? That’d literally just calling the police on someone for the offense of that person existing.

The behaviour of the police here boggles the mind.

One single office should approach him with a friendly smile and say “excuse me sir, we’ve had a report of a trespass in this area. Have you seen anything suspicious?”. Or something similar, and let a conversation develop from that. I suspect that identification of a bucket and trash-grabber is easier at close range.

There was absolutely no need for that to escalate at all.