Well, that’s a hell of a lot of useless verbiage.
The fact remains that you attacked a source without bothering to confirm its factual reporting. That’s a sleazy ploy you’d do well to avoid in the future.
Nope, never said that. I pointed out that a substantial number of Charles’ erstwhile subjects have problems with his behavior, while his defenders try to gloss over his actions using the argumentum ad populum fallacy.
Good.
It’s high time that you stopped hogging Martin’s time in the spotlight, seeing that your own postings have already gotten you the attention you seem to crave.